Weight loss increases hunger: a major obstacle for maintenance

weight-lossWe  know about the issue of slowed metabolism after weight loss due to the lean muscle mass loss that goes along with fat loss. This is one reason why higher protein/low carb diets work better than low fat diets; because muscle mass is maintained better. Well, new information from Diabetes in Control backs up what some of us know intuitively or may have experienced personally….

Losing Weight Increases Hunger

The study showed that for every kg of weight they lost, patients consumed an extra 100 calories a day — more than three times what they would need to maintain the lower weight.

This out-of-proportion increase in appetite when patients lost a small amount of weight may explain why maintaining long-term reduced body weight is so difficult.

A validated mathematical method was used to calculate energy intake changes during a 52-week placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients treated with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitor that increases urinary glucose excretion, thereby resulting in weight loss without patients being directly aware of the energy deficit. The relationship between the body weight time course and the calculated energy intake changes was analyzed using principles from engineering control theory.

Previous studies show that metabolism slows when patients lose weight; however, these results suggest that proportional increases in appetite likely play an even more important role in weight plateaus and weight regain.

Knowing that patients with type 2 diabetes who receive the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor canagliflozin (Invokana) as part of a glucose-lowering strategy excrete a fixed amount of glucose in the urine (which causes weight loss), they used a mathematical model to calculate energy-intake changes during a 52-week placebo-controlled trial of the drug, in which 153 patients received 300-mg/day canagliflozin and 89 patients received placebo.  Using this approach meant that the participants who received canagliflozin consistently excreted 90-g/day glucose but were not aware of the energy deficit.

Previously, the researchers had validated a mathematical model to calculate the expected changes in caloric intake corresponding to changes in body weight (Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102:353-358). They input the current study data into this model.

At study end, the patients who had received placebo had lost less than 1 kg and those who had received canagliflozin had lost about 4 kg. The weight loss with canagliflozin was less than predicted, due to the patients’ increased appetite. On average, patients who received canagliflozin ate about 100 kcal/day more per kg of weight lost — an amount more than threefold larger than the corresponding energy-expenditure adaptations.

“Our results provide the first quantification of the energy-intake feedback-control system in free-living humans,” the researchers write.

They add that in the absence of “ongoing efforts to restrain food intake following weight loss, feedback control of energy intake will result in eating above baseline levels with an accompanying acceleration of weight regain.”

The findings suggest that “a relatively modest increased appetite might explain a lot of the difficulty that people are having in both losing the weight and maintaining that weight loss over time. From the results it was concluded that, while energy expenditure adaptations have often been considered the main reason for slowing of weight loss and subsequent regain, feedback control of energy intake plays an even larger role and helps explain why long-term maintenance of a reduced body weight is so difficult.

The findings suggest that an increased appetite is an even stronger driver of weight regain than slowed metabolism. “The message to clinicians is to not only push physical activity as a way to counter weight regain but also use medications that impact appetite.”

In summary, the researchers conclude the few individuals who successfully maintain weight loss over the long term do so by heroic and vigilant efforts to maintain behavior changes in the face of increased appetite along with persistent suppression of energy expenditure in an omnipresent obesogenic environment. Permanently subverting or countering this feedback control system poses a major challenge for the development of effective obesity therapies.

Practice Pearls:

  • Findings suggest that an increased appetite is an even stronger driver of weight regain than slowed metabolism.
  • Appetite increased by ∼100 kcal/day above baseline per kilogram of lost weight.
  • The message to clinicians is to not only push physical activity as a way to counter weight regain, but also use medications that impact appetite.

Obesity. 2016;24:2289-2295. Abstract

Weight plateaus are a normal, but frustrating, feature of your weight loss journey

frustration

 Here are some words of wisdom and encouragement from a health care professional who knows how discouraging weight loss plateaus can be. Don’t let weight stabilisation lead you to jack in your efforts.
When Losing Weight, Warn ‘em!

Diabetes in Control November 8th 2016

I work in obesity medicine. As many of us know, losing weight isn’t the problem for most, but weight regain is.

As the saying goes for many, you can’t be rich enough or thin enough. Many of our patients come in with unrealistic goals regarding their weight loss, and don’t give themselves enough credit for the weight they have lost. Many, for many reasons, regain.
Woman, 58 years of age, class II obesity, prediabetes (A1C 6.0%), HO depression, on antidepressants, weight of 188, BMI 38. Started on metformin and lower carb meal plan.
Warned her early on it’s not just about losing weight, but what’s important is keeping it off. We need plans for both.
Her treatment plan does not end when she loses weight.  Over 6 months she lost 22 pounds. This is a 12% weight loss. BMI 33.5 now.  No further weight loss since the 6-month period, but no weight gain.
Patient frustrated. She has upped her exercise. No longer wants to continue metformin. Encouraged her to continue her meal plan, metformin and bump up her exercise plan. Praised her for her weight loss and not regaining.  And, reminded her this is what we discussed from the start. She remembered and said she’ll stay with the plan.
Lessons Learned:
  • Keeping weight off is a different stage of the weight loss journey.
  • Reminder that losing 3-5% total body weight can improve health outcomes.
  • 5-7% weight loss was shown in the DPP to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes.
  • From the beginning, let patients know there are stages to losing weight. First is to lose, then it’s to keep off the weight lost. Make a plan for both.
  • Regarding weight loss, put more emphasis on the food side.
  • Regarding weight maintenance, put more emphasis on exercise.
  • Remind patient of discussion and encourage patient to embrace the weight loss they have been able to achieve and keep off.

Anonymous

Margaret Coles: Invite this Physiotherapist into your home

At  www.movingtherapy.co.uk. you can find Margaret Cole’s free educational resource to help your health and well being.

home-physio

Margaret worked as a community physiotherapist and when she retired she decided to put her knowledge and experience to good use. She produced videos covering a lot of different situations that you can face regarding your physical and mental states and has put them on the site. She also gives advice on how to lose weight.   People from all over the world have visited the site since 2011.

NHSinform Scotland and her local authority also promote the site.

 

 

Gloomy news if you are overweight

diabetes in cats
He’s a pudgy pussy – but may have a better chance than humans of getting slim again

Obese Have Low Chance of Recovering Normal Body Weight

From Diabetes in Control July 17th 2016

The chance of an obese person attaining normal body weight is 1 in 210 for men and 1 in 124 for women, increasing to 1 in 1,290 for men and 1 in 677 for women with severe obesity, according to a study of UK health records led by King’s College London. The findings suggest that current weight management programmes focused on dieting and exercise are not effective in tackling obesity at population level.

The research, funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), tracked the weight of 278,982 participants (129,194 men and 149,788) women using electronic health records from 2004 to 2014. The study looked at the probability of obese patients attaining normal weight or a 5% reduction in body weight; patients who received bariatric surgery were excluded from the study. A minimum of three body mass index (BMI) records per patient was used to estimate weight changes.

The annual chance of obese patients achieving five per cent weight loss was 1 in 12 for men and 1 in 10 for women. For those people who achieved five per cent weight loss, 53 per cent regained this weight within two years and 78 percent had regained the weight within five years.

Overall, only 1,283 men and 2,245 women with a BMI of 30-35 reached their normal body weight, equivalent to an annual probability of 1 in 210 for men and 1 in 124 for women; for those with a BMI above 40, the odds increased to 1 in 1,290 for men and 1 in 677 for women with severe obesity.

Weight cycling, with both increases and decreases in body weight, was also observed in more than a third of patients. The study concludes that current obesity treatments are failing to achieve sustained weight loss for the majority of obese patients.

Dr. Alison Fildes, first author from the Division of Health and Social Care Research at King’s College London (and now based at UCL), said: ‘Losing 5 to 10 per cent of your body weight has been shown to have meaningful health benefits and is often recommended as a weight loss target. These findings highlight how difficult it is for people with obesity to achieve and maintain even small amounts of weight loss.’

“The main treatment options offered to obese patients in the UK are weight management programmes accessed via their GP. This evidence suggests the current system is not working for the vast majority of obese patients.” “Once an adult becomes obese, it is very unlikely that they will return to a healthy body weight. New approaches are urgently needed to deal with this issue. Obesity treatments should focus on preventing overweight and obese patients gaining further weight, while also helping those that do lose weight to keep it off. More importantly, priority needs to be placed on preventing weight gain in the first place.”

Professor Martin Gulliford, senior author from the Division of Health and Social Care Research at King’s College London, said: “Current strategies to tackle obesity, which mainly focus on cutting calories and boosting physical activity, are failing to help the majority of obese patients to shed weight and maintain that weight loss. The greatest opportunity for stemming the current obesity epidemic is in wider-reaching public health policies to prevent obesity in the population.”

Kings College London News Release
Alison Fildes. American Journal of Public Health. Published online ahead of print July 16, 2015: e1–e6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302773

Drugs that change your weight

Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis  of 257 randomised controlled trials and  summarized the evidence about commonly prescribed drugs and their association with weight change.

They included 257 randomized trials (54 different drugs; 84,696 patients enrolled). Weight gain was associated with the use of: amitriptyline (1.8 kg), mirtazapine (1.5 kg), olanzapine (2.4 kg), quetiapine (1.1 kg), risperidone (0.8 kg), gabapentin ( 2.2 kg), tolbutamide (2.8 kg), pioglitazone (2.6 kg), glimepiride (2.1 kg), gliclazide (1.8 kg), glyburide (2.6 kg), glipizide (2.2 kg), sitagliptin (0.55 kg), and nateglinide (0.3 kg).

Weight loss was associated with the use of: metformin (1.1 kg), acarbose (0.4 kg), miglitol (0.7 kg), bupropion (1.3 kg), and fluoxetine (1.3 kg).

For many other remaining drugs (including antihypertensives and antihistamines), the weight change was either statistically nonsignificant or supported by very low-quality evidence.

 

JP Domecq. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism Drugs Commonly Associated With Weight Change: J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015 Jan 15;100(2)363–370, From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Published in Diabetes in Control Feb 1Metformin_500mg_Tablets

 

Five types of mindless eating. Do these habits sabotage your weight goals?

Chinese_buffet2Dr Brian Wansink is a behavioural economist who studies people’s behaviour around food. Specifically he is interested in how the environment can be manipulated to support or sabotage weight loss efforts. In an interview for Diabetes in Control at the ADA conference in 2012 he outlined the five areas in which we tend to eat more than we intend.

Party bingeing. This is the “I deserve a break”, “I’m celebrating”, “It’s only this once”, “It would offend the host” types of excuses come into play and we abandon our regular habits and go a bit mad with the calories. Alcohol increases our appetites and loosens our will power. If we had any in the first place. Unusual or attractive party food becomes hyper-alluring, and for some of us the urge to try a little bit of everything, three desserts for instance, makes us terribly glad that we wore an elasticated waistband that day. The party phenomenon can also translate to longer binges such as holiday eating or even more problematic, the CRUISE.

Eating too much at meals is particularly easy to do if you were brought up in a household where you were encouraged to “clear your plate”.  Thanks to my mother’s pleading, threats, stories of starving children of you name it, I was 40 years old before I was able to leave anything on my plate. I always had the spectre of my mother behind me at every meal. Things were fine as long as I was able to put food on my own plate, but if someone else handed it to me….down it went.

Some of us don’t feel we can leave a meal unless we are absolutely stuffed. After all, there could be an earthquake, flood, famine, ice-age between lunch and dinner, so you’d better be prepared. Although the advice given to young ladies at Charm School was to always leave the table a little hungry… that is not how many of us do it.

Restaurant behaviour can follow on from the meal stuffing habit. After all, you’ve paid for it! And you are jolly well going to eat it. Things get even worse around buffets. For many of us, buffets are a terrible source of temptation. We have just try a little something from every dish. And when it is an all you can eat buffet….well, there is nothing like a challenge. In any restaurant, no matter how stuffed we may feel, there always seems to be room for a delicious dessert. These are particularly hard to resist if you can actually see them as opposed to just reading about them off of a menu.  For most of us, restaurants are a treat, so the party bingeing mentality, “It’s just the once…I’ll go back to eating properly tomorrow” come into play too.

Snacking and grazing are what many of us to between meals. It should be meaningful work, time with those who matter, or physical activity, but no. The most popular activity is probably more eating.  Snacking can be brought on by genuine hunger. In this case Dr Wansink’s best advice is to eat a hot protein breakfast at the start of the day to get out of the elevenses habit. For others snacks are freely available in the workplace or in the home. Most of the time these are not vegetables with dips or fruit, nuts and cheese but crisps, Doritos, maltesers, chocolates, sweets, biscuits and cakes.  On trains and planes they can include booze as well. Calorific drinks such as hot chocolate and syrup enhanced coffees are popular too.

So when does snacking not count? Well, when you can’t actually remember doing it? Does that make it not count? When you are watching the television, in a cinema, using the computer or even driving it is amazing how dextrous human beings can be. One hand can be employed on mouse skills or on the steering wheel with the conscious brain and eyes engaged on really pretty complex tasks. Meanwhile the non-dominant hand and the subconscious brain are totally absorbed in hand to container to mouth skills just as finely tuned as the finest snooker player can pop the balls into the holes.

Brian says that essentially the first step for anyone is to become aware of any of these habits. You then need to devise strategies that interrupt the unwanted patterns of behaviour. He suggests that people start with one habit and change that first. Starting with what seems easiest and most achievable can give a feeling of mastery that can be worked on. For most things changing the environment around the problem is much more effective than reliance on will-power.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obesity in children needs a whole family approach

Obesity in children is mainly determined by the parents.  Although single genes only account for 2% of childhood obesity, your chances of being obese are a massive 70% if both parents are affected, 50% if one is affected and only 10% if your parents are not obese.

Health care researchers have identified the most important messages for the whole family.

5 fruit and vegetable portions a day

3 structured meals a day

2 hours maximum screen time a day

1 hour minimum exercise a day

0 sweetened drinks a day

Success for the child depends on how successful their own parents are in losing weight and keeping it off. The parents must buy into a change in lifestyle or their child will not get a benefit. Eating healthy meals, mainly at home, and avoiding the fast food and snacking culture are important.

Pre-schoolers and their families are best helped by group classes but for adolescents individual therapy works best.

Based on BMJ Learning module. Most research is was based in Canada.

Low-Carb and Mediterranean Diets “Better Than Low-Fat”

weight lossA report published in today’s Guardian says that low-carb and Mediterranean* diets are better than low-fat plans for losing weight.

The news article by health editor Sarah Boseley also says the research (published in the Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology journal) has found that in the long-term no diet worked particularly well.

The study involved more than 68,000 people and looked at 53 long-term studies that had been carried out since 1960 comparing diets. It was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the American Diabetes Association.

Lead author of the Lancet piece, Dr Deirdre Tobias from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard medical school, Boston, said the research showed there was no good evidence for recommending low-fat diets, as their “robust evidence” showed that simply reducing fat intake would not naturally lead to weight loss. Continue reading “Low-Carb and Mediterranean Diets “Better Than Low-Fat””