Atypical diabetic neuropathies

Photo by Laura Villela Beauty Designer | Brasil on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 11 October 2025

About half of all patients with diabetes will develop a symmetrical polyneuropathy but several other atypical nerve conditions can also occur.

Treatment induced neuropathy of diabetes is an acute and severely painful small fibre neuropathy that occurs with a steep drop in glycated haemoglobin levels.

Radiculoplexus neuropathies include lumbosacral, cervical, and thoracic forms, in which pain and weight loss are followed by weakness and sensory loss in the distribution of a single anatomical region.

Monophasic cranial neuropathies are caused by non-inflammatory microvascular ischaemia and present acutely followed by slow improvement.

Compressive neuropathies are when nerves are compressed.

There is more chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in patients with diabetes than in the general population, but definitive diagnosis is difficult to ascertain when diabetes is also present.

Diabetes now affects 9.3% of the world’s population, and half of them have typical symmetric neuropathy. Carpal tunnel syndrome affects 20-30% of diabetics. Cranial neuropathies affect 1% of the population which is ten times higher than in the general population. Over a five year period, about 10% of diabetics will get a treatment induced neuropathy. Lumbosacral neuropathy will eventually affect 1% of diabetics. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy affects 0.7 to 10.3 people for every 100,000 people. It is the rarest type.

Treatment induced neuropathy is associated with a high rate of damage to the retina and kidney. It is thought that neuronal ischaemia and the release of cytokines damage the small blood vessels to the nerves.

Prior high blood glucose is the main risk factor for this type of neuropathy. Pain, and autonomic symptoms occur such as low blood pressure, gut dysmotility and sexual dysfunction. The usual age of onset is 25 in type one diabetes and 51 in type two diabetes. The faster the rate in improvement in blood sugars, the higher the risk.

The usual presenting problem is pain in the arm or leg within six to eight weeks of rapid blood sugar correction. The pain is usually in the glove and stocking distribution. Unfortunately the pain is often difficult to treat even with modern drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants, SSRIs, gabapentinoids, and sodium channel blockers. The condition and pain usually stablise over three years if the blood sugars can be kept in control and stable. Foot ulceration can become a common problem if the condition becomes recurrent due to blood sugar swings.

Radiculoplexus neuropathy is caused by a vasculitis of affected nerve roots, plexus and individual nerves in the back. Most people have pain. Rapid glycaemic control can be a pre-disposing factor. Leg weakness, foot drop, numbness and autonomic symptoms can occur. It usually stays one sided.

Post surgical inflammatory neuropathy is typically defined as a neuropathy occurring within 30 days of a surgical event. It occurs in non diabetics too, but more often in diabetics.

Multiple mononeuropathies can also occur in diabetics. This tends to affect the lower arm or lower leg.

Figuring out what type of neuropathy is occurring may be done on clinical history and examination, electrodiagnostic testing, MRI scans, blood tests, lumbar puncture, and nerve biopsy.

Most neuropathies require good blood sugar control to improve, may worsen for a period of time before improvement, and may need drug or other treatments and supportive aids such as braces and wheelchairs. Sometimes residual motor deficits such as foot drop can persist long term.

For Facial mononeuropathy a short course of oral steroids starting within 72 hours of onset may improve recovery.

GLP-1 based treatment for diabetes, weight control, and fatty liver disease is rapidly increasing. These agents also rapidly reduce HbA1c levels. A study was done to specifically look at the effects on type two diabetics and polyneuropathy risk on these agents. One group got the weight loss injection and the other got metformin and insulin. Over five years there was no difference in neuropathy diagnoses.

Blood sugar rises for different foods compared

Photo by Kai-Chieh Chan on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 28 June 2025

Our individual metabolic response to different foods types may influence our risks of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Californian researchers decided to test 55 members of the general population after they had consumed various carbohydrate foodstuffs to see what the blood sugar response was over time.

Glucose levels typically peaked at about an hour and were highest for rice, potatoes and grapes. They noted that responses varied considerably between individuals however. Eating fibre, protein or fat before the carbohydrate reduced the size of the peak blood sugar compared with eating the carbohydrate on its own. This of course won’t be news to insulin users who need to check their blood sugar regularly.

Fastest peaks in order:

Grapes – 40 minutes after eating

Potatoes – Berries 50 mins

Bread – Rice – Pasta – Beans 60 mins

Highest peaks in order:

140 -160 mg dL glucose – Rice- Grapes-Potatoes-Bread

120-140 Berries – Pasta

100-120 Beans

Longest lasting blood sugar rises over 100 minutes Pasta-Potatoes-Bread-Rice

Shortest lasting blood sugar rises under 100 minutes Berries-Grapes-Beans

What can we make of this?

If you have a low blood sugar, grapes could be a good option if you don’t have juice or glucose tablets. Otherwise keep them for eating after a meal or with cheese.

In terms of diabetes control, both beans and berries are good options because they don’t raise your blood sugars very much and in addition the levels fall quickly too.

Pasta could be a good option if you are undertaking planned prolonged exercise as it raises the blood sugar moderately and lasts the longest in your system.

Rice, potatoes, and bread produce high blood sugar spikes, so if you like eating these, it is preferable to eat them with some sort of fat, and eat them after the protein component of your meal.

Falling is the main cause for excess injuries in people with diabetes

Photo by Ariel on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 24 August 2024

An Australian study has shown that people with both type one and type two diabetes are hospitalised for injury more often than the general population.

Most of these injuries happened due to falls.

People using insulin have 60% more chance of being hospitalised for injury. Type two diabetics who take sulphonylureas have also a raised risk.

My comments: These findings tend to indicate that hypoglycaemia is a cause of falls. There could also be other reasons. I recall visiting a woman who had two broken wrists. She had fallen in the street and had fallen off the kerb. I asked why she thought she fell. She said, “I can’t feel my feet.” As a fractured hip in older age is a major reason for losing independence it is important for diabetics to aim for as best blood sugar control as appropriate for them, but also to take care to reduce hypoglycaemia.

Testosterone replacement therapy appears to be safe for men with hypogonadism

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 3 Feb 2024

No excess prostate cancer has been found in hypogonadal men who were treated with replacement testosterone over 20 months follow up.

A randomised trial of 5,000 men found no difference in genital problems between the treated group and the untreated group.

The incidences of prostate cancer, acute urinary retention, prostatic surgery, and drug treatment for urinary symptoms were all low and no different between the groups.

My comment: This should be reassuring for those men who need to take testosterone for sexual health reasons and also to correct their hormonal status, as testosterone deficiency can be one cause of type two diabetes in older men.

There are now more type twos than type ones in young adults

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 4 Nov 2023 The Bottom Line: The time to tackle rising type 2 diabetes is T2DaY by Partha Kar consultant in diabetes and endocrinology Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust.

England’s 18-40 year olds with type two diabetes now exceed those with type one. In the not too distant past, type two diabetes was associated with middle age rather than youth. Causes for this increase include lifestyle, environmental and societal factors.

About 4% of people with type two diabetes are now under 40 years of age. Worryingly, this rise in type two diabetes is accelerating fastest in the under 40s. It tends to affect people who are socioeconomically deprived, are in minority ethnic groups, and in those with obesity. And the complications are aggressive.

There tends to be a greater risk of the vascular complications of diabetes compared to later onset type two diabetes. There are poorer pregnancy outcomes compared to type one diabetes. If you are diagnosed at the age of 30, you can expect to live 14 fewer years of life. At diagnosis, multi-morbidity is common and even if not present, can develop rapidly.

The 18 to 40 age group are often in education or working. They face transitions from the family home, to university or the workplace. Money tends to be tight. They are considering buying homes or renting. They may pairing off with partners, and they may already have a young family or be planning to start. Increasingly they can’t afford to buy a home, and put off having children till older ages.

There are now about 140,000 young adults with type two diabetes. It is important that the correct diagnosis is made at the outset, and that pregnancy planning and outcomes are prioritised. Dr Shivani Misra from Imperial College London, has published a Type 2 Diabetes in the Young programme that she hopes will be adopted in order to improve the outlook for these young people and their families.

Meanwhile, Government initiatives are needed to reduce socio-economic deprivation, improve healthy food options, improve space for exercise, and improve people’s motivation to look after themselves.

Artificial Intelligent Computers can accurately diagnose diabetic retinopathy

Photo by Wojtek Paczeu015b on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 30 Sept 2023

Nature has reported that an AI model called RETFound has been successfully trained to diagnose diabetic retinopathy from eye scans.

1.6 million unlabelled retinopathy pictures were used to teach the computer what a retina looked like. After this it was taught to diagnose specific conditions using a much smaller selection of images. The machine was excellent at diagnosing diabetic retinopathy and progress has also been made in teaching it to diagnose cardiac failure, stroke and Parkinson’s disease.

How clever is that!

Type 2 Diabetics lose 3 to 4 years for every decade that they have the disease.

Photo by N I E R O S H O T S on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 7 Oct 23

An analysis of data from 1.5 million people from 19 countries indicates that for every decade that someone is diagnosed with type two diabetes, they will lose 3 to 4 years of life expectancy.

In the USA if you are a 50 year old man, you would be likely to lose 14 years if you had been diagnosed at age 30, 10 years if you were diagnosed age 40 and 6 years if you were diagnosed aged 50, compared to someone who was not diabetic.

My comment: Given that there is a big rise in type 2 diabetes diagnosis in children and young adults, this is pretty concerning. Of course, there are ways to effectively manage the condition and even put it into remission. There are more effective drugs available but cutting out refined carbohydrates and regular exercise are two of the most effective thing that people can do for themselves.

Good glycaemic control improves school grades in type one diabetes

Photo by Pavel Danilyuk on Pexels.com

Adapted from Medscape article by Peter Russell 6 Dec 2022

Children with type one diabetes have more school absences than classmates who do not have the condition, but difficulties with blood sugar control were linked to the most absences.

Despite lower attendances many children with type one diabetes achieve good exam grades and go on to higher education. But those with higher HbA1c levels were more likely to get poorer grades and found it harder to get a place at college level.

Cardiff researchers think that children who struggle with their glycaemic control could benefit from more clinical and educational support.

Researchers looked at over a quarter of a million children aged 6 to 18 and over a thousand children with type one diabetes who attended schools and colleges in Wales between 2009 and 2016. Factors such as the child’s household socioeconomic status, neighbourhood deprivation, sex and age were taken into account.

The results showed that type one children were absent for 8.8 sessions per year more than children without diabetes. Those with the best glycaemic control missed 6.7 sessions per year and children with the poorest levels of control missed 14.8 sessions.

Children in the quintile with the best glycaemic control got results 4 grades higher than those without diabetes at the age of 16. However for those in the lowest quintile of HbA1c control attainment was 5 grades lower than their classmates who did not have the condition.

Those with the best glycaemic management were 1.7 times more likely to gain a place in higher education than the general population whereas those in the lowest quintile for glycaemic management were 0.4 times as likely to go onto higher education than those who did not have type one diabetes. In essense those in the highest quintile were almost three times more likely to attend higher education than in the least optimal quintile.

Dr Robert French, one of the researchers was impressed that children with diabetes under adequate control were as likely to progress to higher education as their non diabetic peers even though they lost more school days to diabetes.

Overachievement for children with type one diabetes who effectively managed their glycaemic control could be due to factors unrelated to glucose levels and could reflect socioeconomic conditions, family support and effective self management.

Robert French et al. Educational attainment and childhood onset type one diabetes. Diabetes Care 1 Dec 2022 45(12) 2852-2851.

My comment: I know from my own experience of being a parent of a child with type one diabetes that the formulation of strictly kept routines around blood sugar testing, meals, homework, activity, and sleep made a big difference to my son’s blood sugar control and educational attainment. By my son’s diagnosis it had been already discovered that 9 out of 10 diabetic children had worse school attainment than average for their peers and that high blood sugars affected concentration, mood and memory. It would seem that for most diabetic children the educational gap has been greatly improved in the 20 years since. The overachievement affect is understandable when a child or young adult is given more family support, and this is usually maternal support, during their adolescent years, than is perhaps the case for non diabetic children. The adoption of a low carb diet makes glycaemic control much easier for all diabetics and this is even more important when the hormonal surges of puberty are causing glycaemic uproar, and the need to perform in exams can determine future career paths.

Dr Sheri Colberg: exercise for diabetics Q and A

Photo by MART PRODUCTION on Pexels.com

Diabetes in Control Nov 6, 2021

Author: Sheri R. Colberg, PhD, FACSM

Q: Can you speak to the ability or inability to “cure” T2D? Does it have to do with the loss of the pancreatic beta cells?

A: Yes, it has generally been shown that new-onset type 2 diabetes is easier to “reverse,” meaning that blood glucose levels can be so well managed that it appears diabetes has been cured. Over time, a loss of some insulin-making capacity occurs in people with long-standing T2D, particularly if it has not been well-managed, related both to the impairment of pancreatic β-cell function and the decrease in β-cell mass. (PMID: 27615139)

Q: Isn’t insulin resistance now found to be in T1DM as well?

A: Yes, anyone can develop insulin resistance, and it occurs in at least a third of people with type 1 diabetes as well, although it is not always associated with excess weight gain or overweight. Since people with T1D lack insulin due to the body’s own immune system killing off the pancreatic β-cells, greater resistance increases the total doses of insulin needed (whether injected, pumped, or inhaled). Thus, they have developed characteristics of both types and have “double diabetes.” (PMID: 34530819)

Q: Under lifestyle goals, would you include stress management?

A: Stress management was not assessed in the large multi-center clinical trials on type 2 diabetes prevention, but mental stress can certainly raise blood glucose levels due to the greater release of glucose-raising hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. It certainly would be beneficial to address better ways to manage mental stress as part of lifestyle goals for optimal blood glucose outcomes. (PMID: 29760788)

Q: As each person has their own limitations, how important is it to get a physician clearance and exercise guidelines before working with the client?

A: It really depends on the person’s circumstances. How intense will the planned activities be? Is the person currently sedentary? Has he/she been getting annual checkups to monitor blood glucose management and to check the status of any complications? Does he/she have diabetes-related or other health complications that could be worsened by physical activity? The lower the intensity, the more active an individual has been, and the lower the risk for cardiovascular complications, the less likely medical clearance is absolutely necessary.

The latest ACSM Consensus Statement on activity and T2D will be released in early 2022 in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and states, “For most individuals planning to participate in a low- to moderate-intensity physical activity like brisk walking, no pre-exercise medical evaluation is needed unless symptoms of cardiovascular disease or microvascular complications are present. In adults who are currently sedentary, medical clearance is recommended prior to participation in moderate- to high-intensity physical activity.”

Q: Can flexibility training be used for warmups, or do you recommend it only after the workout?

A: While it is possible to do flexibility training at any point during a workout, joints tend to have a greater range of motion after blood flow to those areas has been increased with a light or short aerobic warmup. It may be prudent to do a quick aerobic warmup, some stretching, the full workout, and then more extensive stretching afterwards for optimal results.

Q: Was there any particular protocol for strength training? sets, reps, periodization? What is considered “intense” resistance work? Would fatigue based off of several sets of moderate intensity be recommended then?

A: That is a tough question, and it depends on who you ask. I have seen a lot of debate over the optimal strength training protocol during the many years I have been in the exercise/fitness world. If people are just starting out with resistance training, they will gain from doing even a minimal amount of training.

Starting out with 1-3 sets of 8 to 10 main exercises that work all of the large muscles groups at a light to moderate intensity is considered appropriate for most older or sedentary adults, many of whom have joint limitations or health issues. Moderate intensity is considered 50%-69% of 1-RM (1 repetition maximum) and vigorous is 70%-85% of 1-RM. Both intensity (fewer reps at a higher intensity) and the number of sets (3-5) or days of training (starting at 2, progressing to 3 nonconsecutive days) can increase over 2 to 3 months. Periodization is usually not undertaken by older adults, but may be appropriate for younger, fitter ones.

Q: Do you have any insight or are aware of any studies that involve high intensity (%1-RM) resistance training and T2DM? Or any studies that compare resistance training volume (Sets x Reps x Load)?

A: Some older studies have determined that glycemic management is improved by supervised high-intensity resistance training in people with type 2 diabetes (PMID 12351469). Others have also found that home-based (and, therefore, unsupervised) resistance training results in a lesser impact on blood glucose levels, likely due to reductions in adherence and exercise training volume and intensity (PMID 15616225).

Q: I’m still confused about glucose response to acute exercise. Which is better if you want to bring down your BG right now? Can you speak to the possibility of increased blood sugars with intense aerobic exercise?

A: Most light-to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise will lower blood glucose levels, assuming that some insulin is present in the body. (People who are very insulin deficient may have a rise in blood glucose from doing any activity.) Any activity that gets up into the intense/vigorous range, even if only during occasional intervals, has the potential to raise blood glucose due to a greater release of glucose-raising hormones during the activity. This is particularly true if the activity is short and intense. In individuals with any type of diabetes, declines in blood glucose during high-intensity interval exercise are smaller than those observed during aerobic exercise.

That said, if someone wants to lower blood glucose right now with exercise, it also depends on the timing of exercise. Doing something light to moderate for at least 10 to 30 minutes is the best bet, particularly after a meal when insulin levels are generally higher. Avoid doing intense aerobic or heavy resistance training as those may have the opposite effect. For early morning exercise, any intensity can potentially raise blood glucose due to higher levels of insulin resistance then and lower circulating levels of insulin in the body.

Q: I had an endocrinologist say that long runs or walks are better, and another one said to do a bit of weights.

A: Which activities someone chooses to do should depend on the goal of the training. Is it increased fitness, lowering blood glucose levels acutely, or gaining strength and improving overall blood glucose management? Long, slow aerobic training does have the benefit of increasing cardiorespiratory fitness and lowering blood glucose levels (in most cases). Resistance training, on the other hand, increases muscular strength and endurance and helps people gain and preserve muscle mass, which is where most carbohydrates are stored in the body. It may not, however, lower blood glucose levels, at least not acutely.

Both have their place in a weekly training regimen. Insulin resistance is lowered for 2 to 72 hours following a bout of aerobic training. Resistance training has more of a long-term impact on insulin action by enhancing carbohydrate storage capacity. The best advice is to do some aerobic training at least every other day and some resistance training at least 2, and preferably 3, nonconsecutive days per week. These activities can be done on the same days or different ones.

Public Health Collaboration Edinburgh

I attended the PHQ conference in Edinburgh on 17 March 23. This was the first such meeting in Scotland and it was well organised, interesting and well attended.

Moira Newiss is on your far left of the photo in her navy dress and black boots. Moira organised the meeting and also spoke about her experience of having post viral fatigue twice in her life. This led her to explore the functioning of the mitochondria in our cells. She found that the mitochondria don’t function normally and become depleted in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia but that primitive pathways in the cell using ketones for fuel are still active. She started a ketogenic diet and recovered completely from her chronic fatigue syndrome. She now runs for a hobby.

Dr David Unwin is standing next to her and is wearing a bow tie and suit. He is now 65 years of age and has been promoting low carb diets in his practice for the last ten years with great results. He is having so much fun that he doesn’t want to retire!

He found that in many cases type two diabetics can reverse their condition completely by the adoption of a low carb or ketogenic diet. Statistical analysis showed that the people most likely to reverse their condition had had been diagnosed in the previous 18 months. There is thus a great window of opportunity for advice and coaching to be provided to these patients at the earliest opportunity after diagnosis.

Results after 18 months are more variable, with a great improvement in diabetes seen, but sometimes not to the extent that complete remission occurs. Some medication support is often still necessary. Insulin may be able to be substantially reduced or stopped but some alternative medication may still be required.

Monitoring of patients blood sugars will still be required for both groups lifelong in case high blood sugars return. This can be due to secondary beta cell failure and may require tightening up of the diet, the addition of medication and sometimes insulin. If higher blood sugars and weight loss is reported, pancreatic cancer requires consideration and this is detected by urgent MRI scans. Sometimes a patient has been wrongly diagnosed as type two when they are really type one. In all cases they will need to see their GP for diagnosis.

Dr Iain Campbell is standing next to Dr Unwin and is wearing a waistcoat and white shirt. Iain told us about his struggles with bipolar disorder. There certainly could be a creative advantage to this illness, as Iain spent his young day in a rock band and even now is a successful composer. He has now settled into fatherhood and medicine and since starting a ketogenic diet has been mentally stable. My comment: Dr Christopher Palmer in the USA has also researched this phenomenon and there is a blog article on this site about him. Iain works at the university of Edinburgh, and has done preliminary studies in other patients who have bipolar disorder and has found that anxiety, depression, mood swings and impulsiveness all improve with a ketogenic diet. Further research is planned.

Dr Rachel Bain, on your far right, is a psychiatrist and works with Ally Houston, who is standing beside her, to promote coaching for mental health patients in the low carb diet. The site is metpsy.com.

Rachel explained that the gut and brain are very intimately connected and share the same neurotransmitters. The gut microbiotica are affected by what we eat. This affects our mood. If leaky gut occurs inflammatory substances can gain access to our blood vessels and cross the blood /brain barrier to cause neuro-inflammation. This is one cause of degenerative brain conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. The foods most likely to disrupt the junctions between the gut cells are sugar, starch, gluten and alcohol. She and Ally as well as other team members treat people who have Attention Deficit Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Binge Eating Disorder, Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia. They don’t aim for a person to stop their medication so much as to gain control of their lives.

Ally Houston used to be a physicist but is now a chef and low carb coach. Comment: Ally also appears in a previous blog post on the site. He explained what coaching was and wasn’t. It isn’t telling someone what to do. It is exploring with the person how their life works now and how they can introduce positive changes around eating sugar, starch, vegetable oils, exercise, stress reduction and sleep.

The services at met.psy.com are out with the NHS and there is a fee for the services, but it is very reasonably priced.

PHQ are expecting videos of the conference to be available on You Tube now or very shortly.