Protecting yourself from fraud and scams

Photo by Tara Winstead on Pexels.com

Recently I attended an online seminar on how you can protect yourself from fraud and scams. This was organised by my bank and had input from a detective who investigated frauds and scams and a psychologist. These are my “take home” notes.

We are all capable of being duped by increasingly sophisticated frauds and scams. The psychologist repeatedly said that her number one tip was to avoid the assumption that you are too smart, or too worldly wise to notice if you are being targeted as a potential victim of a scammer. It could happen to you!

Frauds and scams can come from multiple directions. In person, online, by phone or in shops and restaurants.

Our background and emotional state results in us believing things from our own point of view. How can it be otherwise? We don’t see the wider context and tend to match information we get with information we know.

Scammers often take advantage of current events. Desirable products and services are also used as hooks to grab our attention. Often things that look too good to be true are not true.

If you get a one time passcode from a source you must NEVER give this to someone else.

We unwittingly give away data and information about ourselves all the time via websites, accounts, and social media like Facebook. Data can be breached by companies.

We are duped into letting our guards down by certain factors that increase our vulnerability.

CONTEXT – The information we are given makes sense to us and makes us expect certain things and makes us feel safe about us taking various actions. Eg a family member asking for help.

AUTHORITY- We tend not to question this. Eg the Police or your bank contacts you about a matter.

URGENCY- We are propelled by fear or worry or sympathy to solve the problem or grab that offer immediately. We suspend thinking things through ourselves, checking facts independently or talking it over with a family member or friend.

EMOTIONAL- We are engulfed in strong emotions such as panic, fear or excitement so that we don’t think.

Although we tend to think that certain groups are more vulnerable than others, such as the elderly, because they are unfamiliar with technology, scams are also inflicted on young people because they want to fit in with their pals or are inexperienced. Middle aged people are targeted in romance scams. We all want something. We all are fearful of losing things. And our personal vulnerability is not dependent on our intelligence and is not a steady state.

Our vulnerability can depend on such matters as the time of day or night, if we have been bereaved, had a baby, are exhausted or we are overwhelmed with information. During times when we feel depleted we tend to take short cuts.

Environment has been shown to be more important than individual factors for most of our actions.

Push payments happen when we are urged to freely give money to someone. No one has an actual gun to our heads but we are convinced at the time that we are doing the right thing. Romance fraud and ” your bank account details have been compromised” frauds are examples here.

These have nothing to do with our personal intelligence or knowledge. Technology can’t protect you against this because you willingly over-ride the systems banks put in place to warn you. To be forewarned is forearmed, so accept that you COULD be a fraud victim and take your time, think it through and talk to other people about what is going on.

Make sure you have a UNIQUE password for each of your accounts. If you do this you don’t need to change it that often. If you don’t then one password breach can mean multiple accounts being breached. It is like having a lock on every room of your house. You won’t lose everything.

Use password managers. Your phone number is public information. Whatsapp is a favourite site for Mum and Dad scams. Again, take your time to think clearly. If a child has “lost their phone”, e mail and phone them to make absolutely certain of their circumstances. Set up code words or questions with your family so you know it really is from them.

Banks will NEVER ask for you PINs, passwords or personal information.

A site called “Have I been Cloned” will show any data breach.

“Last Pass” is another helpful site.

Having two factor identification is really helpful.

Cookies from vendor sites are generally safe. They are usually there to improve your shopping experience. Have anti virus software in your computer though.

Always shred any documents that have personal information on them before you put them in the bin. These can give away information that can be sold onto scammers.

Happy New Year!

GP apprenticeships will start in September 2023

Photo by Klaus Nielsen on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 30 July 2022

The idea of GP apprentices has been discussed for a few years now, but at last the scheme is starting up in September 2023.

The new scheme hopes to solve a lot of problems with one fell swoop.

There is a great shortage of doctors in the UK and particularly in General Practice, the foundation of the NHS system. At the same time, the expense of becoming a doctor, with student debt on qualification reaching £100,000, is making it a difficult choice for students who don’t have wealthy parents.

Universities have limited places for medical students. Although a few new medical schools have opened their doors such as Buckingham University, which is entirely privately funded, this has been insufficient to maintain GP numbers which continue to fall.

For several years conversion courses for graduates from other disciplines have been running at for instance Dundee University. This results in qualified doctors after a four- year course.

Courses for physician assistants have also been taking in graduates from careers allied to medicine in for instance Aberdeen University. Yet, there are simply not enough physicians and physician assistants to fill gaps in provision, as many of our UK readers will have noticed, whether they are seeking a GP or a hospital appointment.

What is different about GP apprenticeships is that the student will earn a wage from their very first day. I don’t know what that wage will be yet. Hopefully enough to make the experience worthwhile and at least prevent them ending up in debt.

The aim is to make medicine more accessible to students from state schools and poorer backgrounds. They want to see students from diverse backgrounds rather than just the white upper middle- class students from private schools who currently predominate.

Apprentices will complete both academic and practical education and come out with a medical degree and licence to practice from the General Medical Council.

Healthy life expectancy falls for those in less affluent areas in the UK

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 30 April 2022

The National Office for Statistics from 2018 to 2020 show that men born in the poorest areas of the UK are expected to live ten years less than men from the most affluent areas. Poor men can expect to live a healthy life till the age of 52 and die around the age of 73. Wealthy men may expect to live in good health till they are 67 and die around the age of 83.

Women in the poorest areas can expect 19 fewer years in health compared to wealthier women. They can expect to be healthy in poor areas till they are 52 and this is 71 for wealthy women. Women in poor areas can expect to die around the age of 70 and wealthy women around the age of 86.

There has been a bit of a decrease in life expectancy generally in the last few years, pre-covid. David Finch of the Health Foundation says that improvement in incomes is needed to cope with the rising cost of living, secure jobs and decent housing.

My comment: What goes on at the doctor’s surgery and hospitals is just the tip of the iceberg regarding health. Housing, employment, a good diet, access to green spaces, social interaction, education, good transport, reduced pollution, clean water, freedom from violence, and good health behaviours such as diet and exercise habits, known collectively as the social determinants of health are much more important. Policies that will improve these factors are necessary to improve the situation. I would argue that living a healthy life is more important than an extra few years in a nursing home.

University College London: Diabetes has trebled in England in the last 25 years

Researchers from UCL analysed the results the latest results from the Health Survey for England.

Data from 8,200 adults and 2,000 children living in private households showed that diabetes has risen in men from 3% to 9% and from 2% to 6% in women since 1994.

Those from poorer households and those with obesity are much more likely to be affected than the slim and affluent. 16% from the poorest homes had diabetes compared to 7% in the highest income group. If you are of normal weight there is a 5% chance of diabetes, 9% if you are overweight and 15% if you are obese.

Obesity is a marker for poverty. 39% of women in deprived areas were obese compared to 22% from least deprived areas. The weight of children was closely correlated with their parents.

Professor Jennifer Mindell said,” Diabetes has become more common in both high and low income countries over the last few decades. It increases the risks of circulatory diseases and cancers. This year we have also seen a rise in serious infection and death such as with Covid-19. Obesity reduction would help all of these problems.”

The survey also asked about GP visits. 69% of men and 82% of women had consulted a GP in the previous six months. GP consultations are more common in older ages, especially among men and those who are overweight or obese. 84% said they went about their physical health problems, 11% for physical and mental problems and 5% for an emotional or mental health problem. Women tended to seek more help for mental health problems than men.

Echoing all the other parameters, consultations for mental health problems were more frequent in those with lower incomes. 25% consulted from the lowest income group compared to 15% from the most affluent group.

Elizabeth Fuller, Research Director at NatCen said, ” One in five women and one in eight men screened positive for a possible eating disorder. This can mean eating too much or too little, obsessing with weight or body shape, having strict routines around food or purging after eating. People who are obese, younger adults and women are more likely to be affected.”

Public health collaboration online conference 2021

Sam Feltham has done it again. This year’s conference is now available on you tube right now.

Last weekend there were many contributors from diverse fields including members of the public, doctors, academics, and the scientific journalist Gary Taubes who gave the opening talk about ketogenic diets.

The courses that particularly interested me were about the experiences of type one diabetics who had adopted the low carb approach, how to achieve change, and how to increase your happiness.

There are talks about eating addiction and eating disorders, statins, and vegetable oil consumption.

Much of the material will be familiar to readers of this blog. There are some new speakers and topics which do indicate that a grassroots movement in changing our dietary guidelines is gaining ground.

BMJ: Low carbing for six months can put type two diabetes into remission without adverse effects.

Adapted from Efficacy and safety of low and very low carb diets for type two diabetes remission. Systemic review and meta-analysis by Goldenber JZ et al. BMJ 2021;372:m4743

My comment: Now, we all know this, but there still is a great deal of resistance to the idea that cutting out sugar and especially starch from your diet, can put type two diabetes into remission. Lately there has been a lot more emphasis that very low calorie diets are good for diabetes remission, but let’s face it, starving yourself is no fun at all, and eventually, even if you do manage to keep to a very low calorie diet for many months, you need to do something to maintain that remission, rather than yo-yo back into diabetes. This is why I was pleased to see this report in the BMJ.

This study looked at randomised controlled trials that evaluated low carb diets for at least 12 weeks in adults with type two diabetes. Their definition was less than 130 g of carb a day or 26% of the diet from carbohydrates. A very low carb diet was defined as less than 50g of carb a day or 10% of dietary carbs a day.

They wanted to see if remission was achieved. This was deemed to be a HbA1c of less than 6.5% or a fasting blood sugar of less than 7.0 mmol/L with or without the use of diabetes medication. They also looked at weight loss, HbAIc, fasting glucose and adverse events.

Compared to control diets, low carb diets produced remission at six months in 57% versus 31% in the control diets.

The population studied were 1,357 people aged 47 to 67 years of age and most were overweight or obese. 23 studies were looked at and 14 of these included patients who were on insulin. There was very little in the way of adverse consequences.

Do you have a chronic disease or a long term condition?

Adapted from BMJ 23rd Nov 19. A chronic problem with language by Dr Helen Salisbury

Helen is a GP in Oxford she writes…..

Some years ago I was told the term “chronic disease” had been replaced by “long term condition”. When I asked my non medical friends about it, they thought that both “chronic” and “acute” both meant “severe”.  My comment: whereas they mean something more like “long lasting” and “short lasting” to a doctor.

So a chronic disease sounds like one likely to harm or kill you, whereas a long term condition sounds like something you live with but not die from. As doctors now copy patients into their letters, then perhaps we need to be more responsive to their beliefs?

Impaired renal function, from natural ageing is one of the problems that has arisen from the misunderstanding of the term “chronic kidney disease”.  It can cause people real worry because they imagine that they are a candidate for dialysis or death, yet they are unlikely to be affected symptomatically, nor is it likely to hasten death. Heart failure is another term that causes a lot of distress.

Sometimes doctors need to be precise in their speech and letters to each other so we can’t abandon all technical language.  Copying clinic letters to patients is good practice, even if patients sometimes struggle to understand them completely, because they have a record of the consultation and a chance to clarify the decisions made.

Sometimes we could use more lay terms to reduce confusion. Abandoning “chronic disease” is a good start.

 

 

Dr Peter Tippett: Prevent a second covid wave

Saving Your Health, One Mask at a Time
Published on April 7, 2020

Peter Tippett MD PhD
CEO careMESH; Chairman DataMotion; ex Presidential Advisor; Norton Antivirus creator

We all hear the same things: wash your hands, don’t touch your face, stay at home, stay 6 feet away from others. Viruses live on boxes and plastic and doorknobs and… EVERYWHERE.
How does the average person decide what measures to follow unless they truly understand how these things work or have a clear set of “rules” they can abide by?
I am an Internal Medicine-certified, Emergency Room MD with a PhD in Biochemistry. I have also spent much of my professional life in the high-tech world helping people understand how risk, infection, and the growth of infection behaves. So I thought it might be helpful to folks in my network to explain how personal protection from a virus like SARS-CoV-2 (the formal name of the virus that causes COVID-19) actually works, how any given measure individually lowers risk, how various countermeasures work together, and most importantly, to give you some simple guidelines for day-to-day living in this new COVID world.
Bottom Line on Masks & Gloves:
Wear a mask when you are in “exposure” zones (mainly places with other people).
Treat your home, car, and yard as safe places (no mask or gloves).
Be on high alert on what you are doing with your hands when you are in “danger zones.” This is when you must not touch your face.
Consider wearing gloves (even winter gloves or work gloves can be helpful) but only for short periods of time and only when in “touch exposure” danger zones.
Remove your gloves (and mask) when you return to your safe place.
Wash your hands every single time you take off your gloves or mask or move from a danger zone back to a safe zone.
When you are at home and after washing up, you can relax, scratch your nose, rub your eyes and floss your teeth…without worry.
Protections Work Together
All protections or countermeasures are only partially effective. For example, wearing the seat belt in your car reduces the likelihood of dying by about 50% compared with not wearing it. You can think about that as horrible (“it will fail half the time!”), or as great (“it cuts the risk of dying in half!”). For everything we care about, in all aspects of life, we solve this “risk” problem by using countermeasures together to improve their collective effectiveness. Independently, air bags reduce the risk of dying by about 30-40%. When added together with seatbelts, they are synergistic and reduce risk together by 65-70%. We add licensing, speed limits, anti-lock brakes, police enforcement and other things to achieve very good risk reduction (well into the upper 90s). We need to be even more careful when we drive in more dangerous situations, such as in a snowstorm. Protecting yourself (and society) from COVID works exactly the same way—you just can’t see the snow.
Getting Infected is Not “Black and White”
A tiny number of virus organisms placed in the back of a person’s throat one time is not likely to lead to the average person getting “sick” with COVID. If we placed a tiny number of live viruses in the throats of 1,000 people, less than half would probably get sick. If we placed 1,000 or 1,000,000 viral organisms, the average person probably would get sick. And if we placed a tiny number of organisms 10 or 100 times in a week, the average person would also likely get sick because of the multiple exposures. This is because even in your throat, your body has protective countermeasures such as mucus and cilia and your blood and other fluids likewise have generic immune and other protections. They are just not as strong as we need them to be. Even as people get and recover from COVID or get a future vaccine, 100% of the population won’t be 100% protected, but collectively we will be safe.
Your nose reduces the risk of viral particles getting to your throat. A mask reduces the risk of the viral particles getting to your nose, and social distancing reduces the risk of them getting to your mask. Together, these countermeasures work very well.
If your nose reduces the risk by 80% (see Caveat 1), and a mask by another 80% and the six-foot distance by 80% more, then collectively, the failure rate would be (0.2*0.2*0.2 = .008) = 0.8%. In other words, the collection of countermeasures would be (1 minus the failure rate) = over 99% effective in reducing your chances of getting sick. In this example, any two together would be 96% effective and any one alone would be 80% effective.
So based on this example calculation, if you are standing with your mouth closed and normally breathing close to a COVID carrier as they are speaking to you, you may have a 20% chance of getting sick from that exposure. Add a mask and that would go down to 4%, add distance and that goes to under 1%. Add repeated individual exposures from other people, and your risk gets worse. Add more countermeasures and your safety improves. The power of each individual countermeasure is much less important than their collective power in protecting you.
So How Does a Mask Really Work?
It hasn’t been measured for COVID, but I suspect that almost any mask, no matter how poor, is more effective than a seat belt is in your car. Masks that are FDA-cleared have been tested against a benchmark and have a rating. N95 masks have been shown to reduce 95% of passage of a certain size particle over a certain time period in specific laboratory conditions.
When I worked in a pre-COVID ER, I would change masks 6-12 times in a shift. However well it works in the test lab, wearing the same mask (N95 or not) for a 12-hour ER shift is definitely not as strong as using a fresh one—let alone using the same mask for a week. But it is far stronger than not wearing any mask at all. N95s have benefits over the simple dust masks typically used during construction work, for example, such as: (a) they are more comfortable to wear, (b) the air is more likely to go through the mask than around it, (c) exhaled air is less likely to fog your glasses, and (d) inhaled air is a bit less restricted.
These are similar characteristics to the beneficial properties of cloth masks. So, I am a big fan of cloth masks, even very simple ones. Any mask has 3 main protective properties:
They make it hard to touch your nose and mouth, thus providing great protection for what is the biggest infection vector in most situations — hand-to-face transmission.
They reduce the exposure of your nose and mouth to viruses in the ambient air (directly breathing in viral spray or viral fog).
They reduce the chance that others will get infected from you when you are sick and don’t know it (and when you are sick and do know it!).
Great masks and poor masks can both stop water droplets. Most coughs and sneezes are really composed of a fine spray of water droplets soaked with virus. Stopping the droplets also stops the virus. Dry virus “dies” (see Caveat 2) very quickly so even though individual virus particles are extremely tiny and can enter in the air around a mask, or even go through the mask, they are less likely to infect you than a droplet teeming with viruses being kept “alive” by the droplet. The most likely way a dose of virus will get in your nose or mouth is:
Via touch of your own hand (most likely by far)
Via water droplet-laden virus (cough, sneeze or even breathing)
Via free (or dry) virus “particles” (least worrisome)
The Nuance Behind Mask Testing
I’ve seen many articles that totally miss the mark on the benefits of masks. Many say things like “good to keep your germs from hurting others, but not very good at protecting yourself” or “we tested 1,2,3 layers of different materials and found x% of particles the size of viruses goes right through; therefore these are better than those”.
The testing that matters is way too difficult for anyone to actually do. It would test 1,000 people who wear “certified masks” versus 1,000 who wear homemade masks of different types and see what percentage of each get infected and what percent get hospitalized or die. Proving that virus-sized particles “go right through” old bandannas is mostly irrelevant if the most likely way you will get sick is by hand-face touching, where a bandanna might be 98% effective; or by virus-laden water droplets where the bandanna folded 4-times might be 90% effective; even though it is relatively poor at blocking dry, individual virus organisms, which is the least likely way you will get sick.
How and When You Are Likely to be Exposed
It is best to think of exposure scenarios. Scoring them relative to each other helps to illustrate the relative risk. (numbers are for illustrative purposes only)

Is a Hospital Mask Better Than Homemade?
In many respects, for home users, a mask made of cloth is comparable to a paper-based, certified medical mask. The first reason they are comparable is because the protection math works well whether the mask is 70% effective or 90% effective. In the example above, the total risk reduction would be somewhat better (99.6% vs 98.8%) between using a great mask and a good one when using it as part of a short list of countermeasures working together. That example math did not include other countermeasures you are likely to also use like washing your hands, or wearing glasses or a shield, or sometimes wearing gloves, or avoiding exposure in the first place. All of which would drive the total theoretical risk reduction well above 99% no matter which mask you wear.
First, countermeasures only work if you use them. If you keep a cloth mask in your pocket or purse or hanging around your neck, then when you get near a danger zone you will be more likely to use it. The N95 and similar masks don’t do well after being scrunched up in your pocket. Second, when you are back to your safe place, you can toss your cloth mask in the washing machine and use it again tomorrow. Or better yet, buy or make a couple of masks so one mask is always clean.
Treat masks like underwear: use a fresh one every day (and whenever things happen that make you want to change).
Cloth masks can be fitted, or folded, or worn as a bandanna. Two layers are much better than one, and three are somewhat better than two. Older cloth is likely to pass air better, making it easier to breath if you are wearing it tightly, which prevents air from escaping around the edges. If you are going to have air escape around the edges, arrange your mask so air escapes below your chin. Air turning more corners on the way to your nose makes it tougher for contaminated air to reach your nose, which improves protection.
Consider the inside of your mask as clean, and the outside as contaminated. When you remove it, you have just touched something contaminated so wash your hands, and then clean the mask as soon as it is practical.
Should I be Wearing Gloves, Too?
Wearing a mask uniformly reduces risk. Unfortunately, the case for non-medical people wearing gloves is much less clear because it can be totally useless. They become contaminated just as your hands do. Therefore, wearing gloves for long periods doesn’t help protect others. Both a contaminated glove and contaminated hand can pass a virus either way. If you handle money or touch a door that others will touch, you will both pick up the virus on your gloves and transfer it to the next object or person. If you touch your face wearing gloves, you will be just as likely to drive a virus to your eyes, nose or mouth as if you touched your face with an ungloved hand. Wearing gloves might help you avoid touching your face, but masks are much better for this.
Gloves are best for temporary situations in which you expect “touch exposure”. Use them, allow them to be contaminated, and when you are away from the touch exposure zone, take them off, wash your hands and get on with life.
So, use them for short periods of time for a specific purpose. For example, I recommend wearing gloves (and a mask) when you go to a store. Put them on when leaving your car, feel free to open doors, touch things, move things, with abandon, however, never touch your face when you are wearing gloves. Use them when paying, and when typing your pin or signing for your purchase. When you leave the store remove them and if they are disposable, throw them away. When you get to your car, open the door, clean your hands with your sanitizer or wipes, and go back to your safe zone.
My 90-something mother lives in an elder-care apartment complex. There are others there who have COVID. Her apartment is her safe zone. She wears a mask (just the sleeve from an old shirt) and winter gloves when she ventures into the hall and down the stairs to a common area to pick up her mail.

She can hang on to the railings, punch buttons, open doors and breathe freely as she does her work outside of her safe zone. When she gets back to the apartment, she removes the mask and gloves, puts the mask in the wash (she has the others available if she needs a clean dry one), washes her hands and gets comfortable in her safe zone. By the way, the winter gloves will become un-contaminated over time as long as they are dry (see below), and they can be used again the next day since the inside is going to stay clean. If you really want to decontaminate them, they can be put in a 250-degree Fahrenheit oven for a half hour or set out in the sun.
What About Grocery Bags?
You can go crazy worrying about the bags and store items and packages you bring into your safe zone. In general, if they are dry, they are relatively safe. You can make them safer by letting them sit for an hour or more. Bright sunlight or dry air are both virus killers. Keep your hands away from your face while you are unpacking and wash your hands after you have finished putting things away, then consider yourself safe. No one is going to succeed at perfect sterile procedures in the real world, so make a routine that makes sense.
Hand Washing & Sanitizers
Wash or sanitize your hands whenever you enter your safe zone every single time, and when you finish working on things that have a chance of being contaminated. For example, if you are going to do the laundry, get everything loaded in the washing machine and then wash your hands. Same for unpacking the mail, or groceries, or an Amazon package delivery. While you are working on anything that is potentially contaminated, and every time you are in an unsafe environment, pay attention to your hands. When you are shopping or in other danger zones, it is not the time to scratch your nose or rub your eyes. And you should be wearing a mask anyway. Once you are back in your safe zone, wash up, and scratch your nose and rub your eyes all you want. You are in your safe place.
Washing with soap is better than using a sanitizer or wipes, but obviously you need a sink and soap for washing. Keep a pump or wipes in your car and at your home entrance to do a quick job on the way into your safe zones—mainly to keep your safe zone safe.
If you accidentally shake someone’s hand, or touch something worrisome, keep track of your hands, and keep them off of your face until you can wash or sanitize them. In some situations, you might consider letting one hand become contaminated while trying to keep the other relatively clean. You might use the same hand to open doors, for example and the other to do less dirty work until you can wash or sanitize them both.
But in general, if you are home or in another safe zone, quit worrying and don’t bother thinking about washing and face touching. No one can stay sterile for any extended length of time. Save those worries for shorter periods when you are in danger zones.
What about packages and mail delivered on the front porch?
Viruses are always dying. Viruses only “grow” (replicate making more viruses) when they are in the inside of an infected person (or a bat) cell. Everywhere else, they are dying. Depending on where they are and their local environment, they die quickly or they die slowly, but they constantly die. This is the big difference between viruses and bacteria. If you put a million viruses in a drop of water, they will start dying immediately. And there will never be more individual virus particles than you started with. Bacteria, on the other hand, can be in “standing water” with enough other environmental help to replicate and make a big, stinky, slimy mess. Just one or two bacteria double to 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024 eventually to millions of individual bacteria, in your soup, or milk, or pasta sauce, or whatever. Viruses never do this. Outside of the infected person they start dying and keep dying. We can take advantage of this fact to help keep us safe.
For those who think in exponential math, Viruses tend to die via a half-life. Just like bacteria grow exponentially in the soup, viruses grow exponentially in populations of people. Exponential growth is described with a “doubling time”. Similarly, exponential death is described as a “half-life”. Radioactive material has a constant, unchangeable half-life. The half-life for death of viruses, on the other hand, is a good property in the everyday world and is also easy to speed up, and easy to trust.
The half-life of virus particles might be a minute or two on a package on a dry warm day sitting in direct sunlight, or a half hour or more for the same package sitting in a cool humid environment like your basement. So, with these hypothetical numbers, for the package on the porch in the sun, ten half-lives kill off 99.9% of those virus particles in 20 minutes. The same package in your basement might need five hours to accomplish the same kill-off benefit. Sunlight (UV light), heat, dryness, soap, alcohol, peroxide, bleach all rapidly kill viruses.
So even if the outside of the box of Cheerios was contaminated a few hours ago by a sick shopper touching it, by the time you get it home, 99.9% of it is probably already dead, and by the time you eat breakfast tomorrow, after the box sitting in your dry cupboard, another 99.9% of it is likely dead.
Please don’t get sucked into breathless worry because the scientist who (correctly) shows that it is “possible” to find some live virus on cardboard after 2 days. Although true, the risk is infinitesimal. That scientist can find the last two living viruses, but you need a much bigger dose to cause any harm and, in most cases, that all went away yesterday.
But I work in a Grocery Store (or Warehouse)
Please wear a mask! Wear glasses instead of contacts. Wear something over your shirt or blouse that you can take off in the garage or other staging area before entering your safe zone car or home. Wear gloves or not (your employer probably has a requirement). Either way, wash your hands when you take your mask off and when you take your gloves off. When you quit work, wash before you get to your car. Take your outer layer off and gloves off before fully entering your car. Sanitize your hands on entering your car. Do it all over again in your garage or mudroom before getting inside your house. Put your clothes and mask in the wash and take a shower when you get home.
Key Takeaways
Social Distance—Stay six feet from people is a good thing. Ten feet is even better.
Safe Zone—For most folks, your house is a safe zone.
For you, and for family living with you, your yard is likely a safe zone.
When outside, and with no other people nearby, you are in a safe zone
For most people, your car should be a safe zone.
Masks—The easiest, most reliable precaution you can take when out of your safe zone
If you work with the public, you should absolutely be wearing a mask on the job.
If you are in a safe place, a mask has low value, because the risk is already low.
If you are going to put the same mask on and off, then treat the outside as contaminated and the inside as safe.
If you handle the outside of your mask, then consider your hands as contaminated, and wash them.
Don’t touch the inside of your mask with your hands or anything else dirty.
Put the cloth mask in the laundry at least daily. (or wash with warm water and soap).
Have at least two masks so one can be in the wash and the other clean when needed
Don’t bother boiling masks before you wear them. The detergent in your washing machine is easier, stronger, and more likely to succeed by far.
And above all—enjoy your safe zone with your family, friends, cat or dog.
Be Well,
Peter

Caveat 1: I will use statistical examples and numbers to illustrate how this works. The numbers I use are estimates only. I am using them because the exact numbers in each case can be off by huge margins, and the resulting understanding, recommendations and behavior will not change even if a particular situation or study shows instances that are quite different from my examples.
Caveat 2: I know that viruses are not “alive” nor “dead” but I will use “dead” to mean that they are no longer capable of infecting anyone and “alive” to mean they still can.
Reprints: Feel free to republish as you need for educational, public health, public good, and other nonprofit-making purposes. If you repurpose any of this document, then please give attribution to: “Peter Tippett, MD, PhD, CEO careMESH”

My comment: I made a mask out of sock and it looked terrible. I then bought some cotton masks from Amazon for £2.50 each and keep them in a drawer in the house.  I have one in my coat pocket and use it when I am shopping. I have disposable surgical masks that I can wear at work. On return home, I put the used mask in the shopping basket and put a clean one in my coat pocket.

 

Don’t rush to hospital with a burn

It’s now barbeque season, and with this in mind, new research has shown that the best first aid for a burn is to run cool water over the affected skin for at least 20 minutes.This should be started as soon as possible after the event.

In a study of 2,500 children, those given the full 20 minutes treatment were less likely to need hospital admission and half as likely to need a skin graft.

 

My comment: In my childhood my mother put butter on burns. Don’t do this! It does not work. The area that I notice most people have burns is on their wrists on the thumb side. This is from removing hot dishes from the oven and brushing their arm against the hot door or oven sides. Of course you are carrying a hot, full dish of food, so can’t pull back as fast as you would like. Although many of us then run our arms under a tap, it would be a good idea to do this for longer than it takes for the immediate pain to subside. You can also use oven gauntlets in preference to gloves or folded up tea towels as these are longer in the arm. 

BMJ 2019; 367:1572

Public Health Collaboration conference online a great success

The Public Health collaboration online conference 2020  was very successful.  The videos are available on You Tube for free making the conference even more accessible for everyone who needs advice on what to eat to stay healthy.

If you are able to contribute to the PHC fund to keep up our good work please do so. Sam Feltham has suggested £2.00.  This is via the PHC site.

This year there were contributions from mainly the UK but also the USA.

Visitors to this site will be very pleased to know that keeping your weight in the normal range, keeping your blood sugars tightly controlled, keeping your vitamin D levels up, and keeping fit from activity and exercise, are all important factors in having a good result if you are unfortunate enough to be affected by Covid-19. We have been promoting these factors in our book and website for several years now, mainly with the view to making life more enjoyable, especially for people with diabetes, now and in the future. The reduction in the severity  to the effects of   coronavirus is a side effect of these healthy living practices.

Several talks went into the factors and reasons for this, but in a nutshell, if you are in a pro-inflammatory state already, you will have a much more pronounced cytokine inflammatory response to the virus than is useful for clearing the virus, and you end up with inflammed lung tissue which leaks fluid thereby impairing your blood oxygen levels.

A talk that I found particularly apt was the talk from a GP who had had a heart attack at the age of 44 despite a lack of risk factors except for massive stress. He gives a list of self care practices that helped him. I would also include playing with your animals. Emma and I are cat lovers and can vouch for this!

My talk is about VR Fitness, which was the only talk this year which was specifically exercise related. The Oculus Quest has only been out a year and has been sold out since shortly after New Year. I was fortunate enough to buy one in anticipation of my imminent retirement, and it has been great as an exercise tool over the long, cold, dark winter and more useful than I had ever anticipated over the lockdown as a social tool.

There were several very professional cooking and baking demonstrations on the conference this year, and indeed, this could not have otherwise happened on a traditional stage format.  We had low carb “rice”, bread, pancakes and pizza demonstrations which may well help you if you prefer to see how it is done step by step or if you want to broaden your repertoire.

I was particularly taken with the pizza base idea from Emma Porter and I will follow up with this in a later post.  The whole video is available from the PHC  site which takes you to all the videos on You Tube.