What helps and what doesn’t when type one diabetes is diagnosed in adolescence

Some young people cope very well with type one diabetes right from the start and others flounder. Sometimes a young person’s failure to get to grips with the condition has very serious and long lasting effects. So, what things help and what things hinder?

Dr Emily Robinson is a counselling psychologist based in Leicester Royal Infirmary. She interviewed eight type ones aged 28-36 years who had been diagnosed in adolescence and asked them about their experiences. They had been diagnosed between the ages of 11 and 17.

Previous research has shown that how people think about their illness impacts on how well they self-care, their degree of metabolic control and how happy and adjusted they are to diabetes.

Most participants went through a stage of shock and grief around the time of diagnosis. Laura stated, “At first I thought my world had caved in. I was thinking, why me? It is really unfair. I did kind of feel that my life was over”.

Yet, although in the minority, some young people just sort of “got it” right away. No fuss. No muss. Craig said, “I don’t remember there being a sudden change in the way I was personally. I wasn’t panicking for feeling like my life had ended.”

All participants described that their freedom had been at least temporarily curtailed and that they had missed out on things compared to their friends of the same age. Tony said, “I felt I lost my freedom and my ability to do things at the drop of a hat. I had always been a very active child and I was used to going out in the morning, walking and playing in the fields and not thinking of coming back home till I was hungry.”

There is a stage in adolescence where no one wants to be seen as different from anyone else in their peer group. Karen spoke about how this had serious effects. She stopped giving herself insulin injections and ended up in hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis several times.

Most participants described a sense of intense loneliness at the time of diagnosis.  Not knowing any other young diabetics was a problem and sitting in medical waiting rooms along with just grown-ups and elderly did not help.  One young woman, Laura, actually had severe depression. She put this down to not getting the help she needed from her parents.

Indeed parental involvement has been found to be the single most important predictor of positive adolescent outcomes. The less parental involvement and the more responsibility taken by the adolescent the worse the control.  The growth of teenage diabetic transition clinics and internet forums may have made a good difference for todays newly diagnosed type ones.

Parental anxiety had a knock on effect on how well adolescents coped emotionally with their diabetes. “My parents were terrified and in denial”, said Laura.  The reaction of friends had lesser but significant impact too.

Health care professionals need to be really careful about how they speak about diabetes to the newly diagnosed because everything they say is taken to heart.  Jannine spoke of being shown pictures of gangrenous feet and being in a ward of people who had diabetic complications. The “shock treatment approach” left her so frightening and helpless that she avoided checking her blood sugars. “I have never quite forgiven them for that”, she says, over a decade later.

The way in which diabetes was explained at diagnosis has been found to be the strongest predictor of emotional response even two years after diagnosis.

4276166167_e2cf9e2e47_o.jpg

Laura remembers, “I was having a really terrible time and I said something like, if this was a war, I would be surrendering. At the moment I feel that I am really losing. The doctor said to me, I bet you would just like a couple of weeks off, wouldn’t you? And that was one of the most understanding things a doctor has ever, ever, ever said to me.

Seeing the same clinician regularly was very important to about half of the participants. Having a nurse educate her in a supportive and encouraging way, being given choices, setting her own treatment goals and reducing her sense of isolation were particularly important to Jannine.

Over time, everyone with diabetes adjusted to having the condition in a much more positive way. Tony said, “I see myself as being normal. I’m me. I have diabetes but I don’t consider it to be a huge problem. I didn’t think like this when I was 16 or 20 years old.”

Support groups were a help to some participants. “It was astonishing to know that everyone else had problems too”.

Currently transition services for young people still tend to result in high dropout rates, poor attendance and sub-optimal control.  Psychological input may help some people who are struggling at this time.  More frequent appointments, active follow up, and seeing the same clinicians have been found to help.

Between the late 20s and early 30’s has been found a significant time in the lives of type one diabetics. After all, this is when parenthood is most commonly anticipated. A wish to tighten up control in preparation for a life time with diabetes is common. Emily thinks that refresher courses in diabetes management, which don’t currently exist in many areas, would be a good idea at this time.

(Of course, from my point of view, I think that diabetics of all ages would be a lot less demoralised if they were told the best ways to manage their diet and insulin regime.)

So in summary:

What helps:   

Doctor gives an optimistic view of diabetes at diagnosis.

Parents, let your offspring do as much as their friends are doing and usual pursuits as far as possible.

Join family/ adolescent support groups at diagnosis.

Hospital managers provide adolescent clinics at different times from adult/complication clinics.

Outpatient management of insulin initiation avoids admission which can be distressing.

Treat parents as possible patients if they are very distressed. Do they need counselling? Do they need to meet other parents who are more experienced and coping well?

Health care professionals should make an effort to understand the person and the family who has diabetes.

Try to have the same clinicians see the family and patient regularly.

Tailor education to the individual.

Give as much control over to the individual as possible.

Consider psychological input if control is poor or distress is evident.

Provide consolidation courses for the 25-30 age groups.

 

What hinders:

Doctor gives a catastrophic view of diabetes at diagnosis.

Parents keep their child under a tight rein from diagnosis and inadvertently make child feel that they and their lives are very different now.

Being exposed as a new diabetic to very sick older diabetics at clinics or in wards.

Doctors and nurses not talking to parents on their own to see what they may be struggling with.

Too many cooks.

Generic courses.

Courses provided too early in the disease process that don’t seem relevant or where the family/ patient are too stressed to learn usefully.

 Resources for young people with type one diabetes:

https://www.youtube.com/user/type1uncut

http://joes-diabetes.com/pages/joes-rough-guide

http://twitter.com/OurDiabetes

 

Resources for health care professionals:

www.successfuldiabetes.com/working-with-diabetes-workshops/diabetes-workshops/item/111-supporting-young-adults-with-diabetes-a-one-day-workshop

www.diabetescounselling.co.uk

www.diabetes.org.uk/Professionals/Training/–competencies/Courses/Supporting-Young-Adults-with-Diabetes/

Diabetes Australia Position Statement (2011). A new language for diabetes. http://static.diabetesaustralia.com.au/s/fileassets/diabetes-australia/9864613f-6bc0-4773-9337-751e953777cd.pdf

Based on an article by Dr Emily Robinson in Practical Diabetes Nov/Dec 2015

 

 

 

 

“A cross-party long-term strategy is needed to combat obesity in children” says Brian Whittle

553c9c59e22f98bc5d30fa62

Brian Whittle is a gold medallist runner who aims to introduce widespread after school childcare focussed on delivering high quality exercise and physical activities. This is a long term strategy which is fun for children yet could provide immense health benefits and even enhance academic performance.

There are studies which support the validity of Brian’s aims.  But do enough politicians have the long sightedness and will to ring fence funding that is needed?

In order to prevent obesity in our youngsters and the disorders associated with sedentary behaviour a culture change is needed. The unhealthy eating, snacking and reliance on screen based entertainment needs to be replaced by three good meals a day and movement to counteract the long hours sitting in the classroom. Many parents work long hours too, and would welcome group based physical activity for their children in a safe environment.

Brian is seeking support from leaders and health ministers from all parties.  Some headmasters are highly supportive and are delighted with the improved behaviour, reduced truancy and improved grades that they are seeing in pupils who have become more engaged as a result of fun activities after school.

More than 2.3 million children in the UK are overweight or obese and even the under 12s are showing signs of high blood pressure, cholesterol abnormalities, type two diabetes and liver disease.

Dr Tim Lobstein, director of the Childhood Obesity Programme says,  “ It will be tragic if it is not tackled. Chronic diseases are moving forward at an ever increasing rate. Our kids are eating themselves into an early grave. We will have the first generation to die at an earlier age than their parents. Britain along with some other southern European countries are at the top of the list. While soft drink and confectionery sales have rocketed, and TV watching, computer games, and other sedentary media have grown, exercise has fallen. Unless the obesity epidemic is brought under control we are facing the prospect of medicating kids at primary school and for the rest of their lives. If we can just find a way of encouraging healthy growth then we can avoid an enormous amount of grief in the future. Unless we start teaching our children in schools about raising children, feeding them properly, exercise and the difference between good and bad food, then we are just going to exacerbate the problem.”

Getting children to become more physically active and achieve normal weights has been found to improve attention, planning and thus have knock on effects on academic performance. ( Davis CL et al Pediatr Exerc Sci. August 6 2015)

Children who are more active in late childhood can demonstrate lower body weight and lower risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes by their mid- teens.  This means an hour of moderate to vigorous exercise a day. A national approach involving the collaboration of various government agencies would be needed to produce widespread benefit. (Stamatakis E. Pediatrics Vol 135 No 6. 6 Jun 2015)

For younger children under the age of 6, three hours of activity, spread throughout the day is recommended by the US Institute of Medicine. They hope that such recommendations can help reduce overweight and obesity which is currently at 27% in this age group.

For adults at least 30 minutes of activity a day is recommended. The good news is that the earlier you get into exercise the more the habit is like to stick.  Swimming, dancing, walking, running, yoga, jogging, tennis, basketball and football are all suitable. The fitter you are in early adulthood, the lower your total mortality rate and cardiovascular disease rate. There is a clear dose response between exercise and fitness and fitness, well-being and mortality rates. (Shah et al. JAMA Internal Medicine 1-9)

Even if you have been sedentary for years or cannot tolerate 30 minutes a day, it is recommended by the American Heart Association that you start with walking.  Apart from benefits to the individual there is a benefit in health care costs in the future. ( AHA 6 Dec 15)

Emma and I are already into the exercise habit. It certainly is more of a challenge in Scotland with our awful weather and long, dark, winter nights. What good ways have you found to keep active and support your children to be active?

 

 

 

 

Inhaled Insulin

A story on a Minneapolis news website caught our eye this week – it was the story of a New Richmond man who is using inhaled insulin at meals instead of boluses through his pump.

The insulin inhaler – Afreeza – is used instead of injected insulin boluses to cover meals.

Software developer Trevor Schug who was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes last year said he had started using the inhaled insulin this year and he had found that it gave him better control of his blood sugar levels.

On the news website, he said that he felt the inhaled insulin was absorbed into the blood stream more quickly and that it didn’t stay in your system as long, whioch was another bonus as far as he was concerned.

Schug explained that when he would take extra insulin through his pump, it sometimes lingered in his system too long after a meal.

Endocrinologist Dr Mark Stesin said dosing was not as precise for inhaled insulin, which might not make it as suitable for everyone.

The inhaled insulin isn’t recommended for people who smoke or who have recently stopped, or anyone who has chronic lung disease or asthma.

Can shared decision making thrive in the current medical culture?

According to a Cochrane review patients are much more satisfied and have better health outcomes when their health care decisions are made in the context of full information and free choice. Patients said that “being in control” was what they most cherished.

At the present time the NHS doesn’t really support true shared decision making and options are likely to become even more limited with a shortage of doctors and strain on budgets. There also is considerable conflict when it comes to following guidelines which are designed for populations rather than individuals. Should a doctor really let the patient take the consequences of their individual choice or would they just be putting themselves at risk from a General Medical Council hearing?

Yet, not all patients want the most expensive treatments. When given full options a fifth of patients decided to avoid or defer surgery for instance.

What is meant to happen is that patients get given option grids with all the risks, benefits and uncertainties of possible investigations and treatments.  They are then asked, “What is the most important thing to you?” and then the doctor is meant to guide the patient accordingly.

Take bowel cancer screening. Currently all 50 year olds get sent a pack for this along with their birthday cards. Nice that someone remembers eh? They then get given the usual barrage of one sided messages about how bowel screening is really easy and could save your life.

If you care to look at this in more depth bowel cancer screening gives a total mortality benefit of six days to the screened population. The main problem is bowel perforation which occurs in 1 in 800 procedures. This is more likely to happen when going round the bends of the bowel.  Diagnosis of this can be delayed. Presumably with the shared decision making model all this is taken into account and the patient gets a truly informed choice.

Breast screening and statins are similarly pushed with considerable information asymmetry in the NHS.  There is no total mortality benefit to women from breast screening or statins yet that does not stop them being promoted. Not much has changed regarding how health care information is put across to patients in decades. An authoritarian stance is taken by the health care promoter and the patient is treated like an idiot.

With shared decision making it is likely that less money would be spent on useless investigations and treatments. If someone particularly wanted to avoid breast cancer “at all costs” they may be happy to be able to have screening perhaps more frequently than occurs at present, or perhaps they may be offered bilateral mastectomy. Many women would however decline to have mammography and that would be a saving not only for the procedure but for the unnecessary surgery and treatments that follow.

Shared decision making certainly doesn’t occur in diabetic clinics. The high carb / low fat diet is a product of “politics based medicine” rather than “evidence based medicine”.  Shared decision making is not for everyone. There will always be people and situations were doing what a doctor thinks is best is the most appropriate option.

But for a lot of non-acute health issues it is appropriate.  I can only hope that shared decision making doesn’t wither on the vine but a large shift in medical culture will be needed before it becomes regular practice.

Based on BMJ Learning module by Alf Collins.

Red Meat and Cancer Risk

steakConfused about health headlines of late and worried that your low-carb diet might give you cancer?

That might be the case if you’ve been reading the reporting of a certain World Health Organisation (WHO) study looking into diet which said eating processed meat increased the chances of developing colorectal cancer by 18 percent, while red meat was “probably carcinogenic” but that there was less evidence.

It depends on where you read the news of course as certain reporting of the story (and other similar research) has blown it out of all proportion – at least with their sensationalist headlines. Take a bow the Daily Mail.

Zoe Harcombe’s blog dissects the research and the headlines. I’d recommend reading it for a more detailed take on the story.

Personally*, I buy good quality, unsmoked bacon and good quality red meat. I don’t eat ham and other processed meats, mainly because I don’t find them very filling – but I’m happy to eat chorizo occasionally. The headlines don’t bother me in the least.

I’ll keep buying and eating unsmoked bacon and good quality red meat because eating them helps me maintain a low-carb diet, which in turn helps me feel lively and energetic, instead of lethargic, grumpy and depressed.

 

*A disclaimer here – you must make up your own mind about what you choose to eat of course…

Bye-Bye Diet Coke

Get thee behind me Satan...
Get thee behind me Satan…

It’s now… ooh, it’s now 10 days since D-Day, otherwise known as the day I kicked the Diet Coke.

As a type 1 diabetic who follows a low-carb diet most of the time (not all of the time, as I’m not perfect and I find the occasional pull of the chocolate/bread temptation too hard to resist), in theory Diet Coke shouldn’t pose a problem. It’s sugar-free and carb-free after all.

But drinking Diet Coke in the quantities that I did (one-and-a-half litres a day) definitely suggests addiction and who wants to be an addict?

Google “giving up diet coke” and you’ll find lots of forums and discussion threads where people discuss their addictions. Other diet drinks are mentioned, but it’s Diet Coke that seems to form the commonality – suggesting that there is indeed something addictive in Diet Coke, even if that is just its psychological pull.

Continue reading “Bye-Bye Diet Coke”