Dr Sheri Colberg: Why insulin does not always work predictably

 

Migraine.jpgHead Scratching Days with Insulin Action Changes

From Diabetes in Control
August 6th, 2016

by Dr. Sheri Colberg, Ph.D., FACSM
The topic of insulin action (resistance and sensitivity) has come up multiple times over the years in my articles, but it is admittedly much more complex than I often make it out to be.

In a DIC article last summer, you can find a short list of all the factors that can potentially improve insulin action (basically insulin sensitivity). In reality, though, sometimes it is impossible to know exactly what is causing your reduced insulin action from day to day and how to easily and consistently manage it.
Recently, I spent the majority of two days traveling in a car and not exercising, and I reached the point where I could barely eat anything without my blood glucose rising over 200 mg/dl, even when giving twice or three times my usual insulin dose for the same food.

Just sitting in a car and not exercising resulted in full muscle glycogen stores, with no room to store more carbohydrate—hence the resulting muscular insulin resistance.

Although I have an extensive working knowledge of nutrition, exercise, and diabetes overall, even I was frustrated by dealing with my lack of immediate control, even though I knew that physical inactivity was the cause. It was hard to anticipate how large of an impact it would have and how much insulin it would take to overcome it.
Based on my personal experience, I want to take some of the burden of always being on top of blood glucose levels off of people with diabetes (PWD). You have to realize that sometimes you can do everything right and your insulin action can still less (or more) than expected. It’s not necessarily your fault, nor can you always anticipate how to best combat it.
Here is my short list of factors from my personal experience that can make people insulin resistant one day and insulin sensitive the next—and not always as you would expect. I call those the “head scratching days,” but sometimes it’s more like hair pulling!
If you’ve had a prior hypoglycemic event
Going too low and staying there for a while (such as during sleep) may increase insulin resistance more than just having a simple hypo event and treating it quickly. Morning insulin resistance is the most variable anyway (higher levels of cortisol then). It is admittedly my most frustrating time of day since often the same exact breakfast and starting blood glucose level will result in a different rise in blood glucose levels. Sometimes an overnight low explains it, but sometimes it doesn’t.
If your blood glucose has been running high
Hyperglycemia begets more hyperglycemia because it causes insulin resistance. That is why sometimes it takes way more insulin than you would expect just to get back to a normal level, and it may take hours. Try not to overdose on insulin in the meantime (especially at your bedtime) or you’ll end up low and back on the blood glucose rollercoaster.
If you’ve drastically changed your normal exercise patterns
Heightened insulin action due to your last workout is fleeting, and sitting in a car for two days is a dramatic change for me, particularly since my basal and other insulin doses are set for being active, not for being inactive. Even a week of detraining (due to injury, vacation, sickness, or other life event) can cause insulin resistance to rise rapidly in everyone, not just in people with diabetes. If you start working out more overall or just more regularly, your overall insulin needs (including basal) may also decrease. Just try to be as consistent as possible to make it easier for yourself to manage.
If you ate more calories, fat, or protein than you realized
Eating out at restaurants is really hard for me because no matter what I order, it seems like it takes two to three times my usual insulin doses to cover it. It is likely because protein and fat kick in and affect blood glucose levels later on (3-6 hours after a meal) and restaurant meals have more calories in them than most home-cooked meals. Fat, sugar, and salt keep people coming back to the restaurant for more! You can strategically use protein and fat intake overnight or after exercise to help prevent later-onset lows, though.
If you’re stressed, mentally or physically
It is truly amazing how much of an impact that stress has on blood glucose levels. Just try going to court (if you’re not an attorney) and keep your blood glucose in check while your adrenaline is pumping. Your cortisol levels also go up and raise blood glucose. So, just being stressed out during the day, or being exhausted or sick (physical stress), can cause insulin resistance. Try to take deep breaths and get some exercise during the day to combat both the stress and the resulting insulin resistance. Getting sick and running a fever or having an infection can also drive your blood glucose and insulin needs up.
If you’re lacking on sleep
Not getting enough sleep is physically (and often mentally) stressful. I knew an oceanography professor who had to harvest samples at sea, sometimes for days at a time, on no sleep.  The longer he went without sleeping, the higher his insulin resistance became. Lack of sleep may be causing some of your unexplained highs since more cortisol (a stress hormone) is released when you are sleep-deprived.
If you’ve had some alcohol to drink
Alcohol interferes with the normal function of the liver in making and releasing glucose. While it can lead to hypos, it can also be used strategically to relieve insulin resistance or to keep it in check—and luckily it does not take much alcohol to have an effect. An older guy called me on a diabetes hotline I was manning for a TV station once and explained that he usually had two shots of whiskey at night and woke up with good blood glucose levels, but that if he ever had to skip the whiskey, he would wake up too high.  He wanted to know what he should do.  I said, “Keep drinking the whiskey!” No more than one drink daily for women or two for men is recommended, though, so do not overdo it or you raise your risk of other health problems.
If it’s a certain time of the month (women only)
You may have everything else accounted for and your blood glucose levels are still skyrocketing for apparently no reason—except that you’re either ovulating (and releasing extra hormones that promote insulin resistance) or in the few days or week leading up to your period when insulin resistance is highest.  This has been a bigger issue for me later in life since my cycles seem to be more extreme, although I do not know if this is the case for all women. I helped a diabetes educator recently figure out that she was actually pregnant when she simply could not figure out why her blood glucose levels were so whacked out; it can be as simple an explanation as that (and hopefully a desired one, if you are pregnant).
Regardless of what is causing your (unexplained) insulin resistance, just try to control your blood glucose levels the best you can and lose the guilt over not knowing exactly why it is high and not being totally in control of your blood glucose levels 24/7. Even the most knowledgeable of us have our head scratching and/or hair pulling days trying to figure it out!

In addition to my educational web site, Diabetes Motion (www.diabetesmotion.com), I also recently founded an academy for fitness and other professionals seeking continuing education enabling them to effectively work with people with diabetes and exercise: Diabetes Motion Academy, accessible at http://www.dmacademy.com. Please visit those sites and my personal one (www.shericolberg.com) for more useful information about being active with diabetes.

PUBLIC HEALTH COLLABORATION: WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR WHEN STARTING A LOW CARBOHYDRATE DIET

PHC-Space-Top

 

FOR EVERYONE

As you start a low carbohydrate diet your kidneys get better at excreting salt thus you will usually find that you lose a lot of water from the tissues of the body.  This can make you instantly slimmer, particularly around the legs, but also can give some cramps in the muscles when you exert yourself.  Be aware of this and add extra salt to your food, and drink plenty of water.  When you are on a low carbohydrate natural foods diet you will be consuming considerably less sodium chloride, which is present in many processed foods including sweet ones.  Bread for instance has a lot of added salt that most people are completely unaware of, therefore feel free to be liberal with the salt cellar.

 

BLOOD PRESSURE

Blood pressure comes down, partly due to less water retention, but also due to lowered natural insulin levels in the body.  As the weight comes down as well, blood pressure tends to drop.  For most people who are not on any antihypertensive drugs they may feel slightly lightheaded from time-to-time.  This can be abolished by adding more salt to the diet.

For people who are on medication to reduce their blood pressure they should have their blood pressure measured by their general practitioner and cut back on medication on embarking on a low carbohydrate diet if their blood pressure is under 140/90.  After a few weeks on a low carbohydrate diet they will be adjusted to a lower level of blood pressure.  Thereafter blood pressure only requires to be checked on several occasions with each extra half stone of fat loss.

It is helpful to buy your own blood pressure monitor as measurements done when you are relaxed at home tend to be more accurate than those undertaken in a surgery.

As many blood pressure medications have more than one use, and different effects on the body, it is worth discussing with your general practitioner which ones would be better to cut out altogether or which ones could be reduced in dose.  This is because certain drugs such as ACE inhibitors and sartans have an extra protective effect on the kidney and this can be important for diabetic patients. They also help improve heart function in cardiac failure.

Beta-blockers are sometimes given to people with atrial fibrillation, or who have had a heart attack, or who suffer from angina, and continuing these may be a priority for some individuals.

BLOOD SUGAR REDUCTIONS

Blood sugar reductions happen rapidly with a low carbohydrate diet.  This is mainly due to the lack of sugar and starch being turned into blood glucose.  This has several effects.

The most pronounced and rapid effect could be on the eyesight.  The lens of the eye adjusts to a particular blood sugar and if the level goes suddenly up, or suddenly down, your vision can become blurry, particularly for reading print.  It is worthwhile avoiding getting new spectacles for about 6 months to give time for the lens of your eye to adjust otherwise you can end up having to get another pair of spectacles at a very short interval and this can be rather expensive.

 

INSULIN and ORAL HYPOGLYCAEMIC DRUG USERS NEED TO TAKE EXTRA PRECAUTIONS

Type 1 diabetics will have been using insulin from the time of diagnosis.  Increasing numbers of Type 2 patients are going on insulin as their pancreas needs more support as time goes on.  A rapid change in pattern of sugar and starch intake can give dangerously low levels of blood sugar unless the insulin dose is proportionately reduced from the outset of the diet.  The amount of reduction will depend on how high your blood sugars run normally, and how strict your low carbohydrate diet is.

For many people who are taking insulin, or sulphonylurea drugs which also have a marked blood sugar reduction effect, starting on a moderately low carb diet of 100g or so a day may cushion the effect somewhat.

Most diabetics will need to cut their insulin quite dramatically, particularly if they go on less than 50g of carbohydrate a day.  It is normal to have to cut insulin by a half or even two thirds in some individuals.

A close eye on blood sugar monitoring needs to be done and we would recommend that, for particularly people who are operating machinery or driving, they start a low carbohydrate diet over a period of holiday when there are other people around who can assist them should they have low blood sugars, and also people to undertake driving on their behalf.

 

Your own general practitioner or hospital endocrinologist is the best person with whom to discuss your planned reduction in insulin or sulphonylurea medications.

Many patients on sulphonylureas are able to stop these drugs completely prior to starting a low carbohydrate diet and thus remove the risk of low blood sugars completely.  People who use insulin however are not able to do this and must have a degree of background insulin to prevent them developing dangerously high blood sugars and ketoacidosis.

  The normal blood sugar ranges between 4 and 7 at most times.  Drivers must not drive unless their blood sugar is at least 5, and they should re-check their blood sugar after every 1-2 hours of driving.  To treat a hypo use 15-20g of glucose and do not drive till blood sugars are completely normal and you have fully recovered.

Setting an alarm to check blood sugars in the middle of the night, and taking blood sugars at 2½ hourly intervals through the day is advised in the first few days for insulin users.

The normal correction dose is one unit of rapid acting insulin for every 2.5 units of blood sugar elevation. This can be helpful to know if you have cut down your insulin doses a bit too much.

Aiming for blood sugars between 6 and 8 mmol can be a safe strategy in the first 2 weeks after starting a low carbohydrate diet.  Thereafter the blood sugars can be tightened up when insulin requirements are more predictable.  To prevent blood sugars going up and down unpredictably it is best to stick to 3 main meals a day and avoid snacking.

EDUCATIONAL COURSES

For insulin users and people on sulphonylureas it is best to fully understand the implications of a low carbohydrate diet and know how to control your blood sugars and insulin as well as having a good grasp of carb counting prior to undertaking a low carbohydrate diet.  There are many educational resources on the web to do this.  Some of these resources are Dr Bernstein’s Diabetes University on you tube, diabetes.co.uk website and Low Carbohydrate Course which is web based, and diabetesdietblog.com which has two written courses.

LONG TERM

Although it can be daunting to think about the initial difficulties that can occur with a low carbohydrate diet, the long term benefits of improved blood sugars, weight, blood pressure and lipids make the outlook for pre-diabetics, the overweight and people suffering from diabetes much brighter indeed.  It is worth educating yourself about your condition and how to effectively use a low carbohydrate diet to change your health destiny.  The extra planning that you need to do for meals, more frequent shopping for fresh ingredients and often increased expense are worth the long term health benefits.

ALCOHOL

Alcohol can be a pleasant part of life.  Many alcoholic drinks are high in sugar, such as beer and sweet wines, and also cocktails.  These need to be eliminated for success in a low carbohydrate diet.  Spirits such as whisky, gin and vodka have less impact on the blood sugar, and dry red and white wines are also suitable.

For insulin users, and particularly Type 1 insulin users however, alcohol can tip them into unexpected hypoglycaemia if they are consuming more than 1-2 units of alcohol without a corresponding increase in dietary carbohydrate.  This is because alcohol limits the ability of the liver to manufacture glucose, and also blood sugars tend to run much more towards the normal range, around 4.6, when diabetes undergoes an apparent reversal on a low carbohydrate diet.

EXERCISE

Exercise is a very beneficial and pleasant adjunct to a low carbohydrate diet for increased mood and health.  For insulin users and those on medication such as sulphonylureas, adding exercise into the regime early on in the stages of a low carbohydrate diet add an increasing layer of complexity to blood sugar management.  We therefore recommend that unaccustomed exercise is avoided for the first 2 weeks until blood sugar stability is achieved.

 

Dr Katharine Morrison

 

 

Public Health Collaboration: Free booklets

 

LA2-vx06-konsthallen-skulpturThis is the link to the Public Health Collaboration site where you can download for free or order print versions, at a modest cost, of illustrated health booklets that will help you:

 

know what to eat for a wide variety of good health outcomes

plan your meals

count your carbohydrates

lose fat

https://www.PHCuk.org/booklets/

 

Hopefully you will end up somewhere between the extremes of our sisters up there!

Influenza vaccine reduces total mortality in diabetics

flu_shot_advertising

 

From Diabetes in Control

Could Influenza Vaccination Prevent More Than Just the Flu?

 

Currently, only low-quality evidence exists to support efficacy of influenza vaccination to prevent seasonal influenza in patients with diabetes. There is even less information regarding the impact of influenza vaccination on cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality in this population. A recent study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal was designed to evaluate the impact of seasonal influenza vaccination on admission to the hospital for acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or pneumonia, and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Conducted over a 7-year time period from 2003 – 2009, the study analyzed retrospective patient data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in England. The analysis included 124,503 adult patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. At baseline, characteristics such as age, sex, smoking status, BMI, cholesterol labs, HbA1c, blood pressure, medications, and comorbidities were compared between patient groups. Vaccination rates of the included participants ranged from 63.1% to 69.0% per year. In general, unvaccinated participants were younger, had lower rates of pre-existing comorbidities, and were taking fewer medications.

The baseline characteristics of subjects enrolled in this retrospective analysis showed that sicker subjects received the flu vaccination more frequently. Given this observation, and seasonal confounding of flu outbreaks, data adjustments favored fewer cardiovascular events and lower rates of all-cause mortality during the influenza season spanning 7 years of data.  While other studies have shown that influenza vaccination can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients, this study is the first to demonstrate a reduction in cardiovascular events associated with influenza vaccination in patients with diabetes. This study is notable for its large sample size and long duration. However, given the retrospective nature of the study, further trials are warranted to offer conclusive evidence about the benefits of influenza vaccination in patients with diabetes.

Practice Pearls:

  • Previous clinical trials aimed at studying the effectiveness of the flu vaccine in patients with diabetes are often small, inconclusive, and have not investigated cardiovascular outcomes.
  • When data was adjusted for baseline covariates and seasonal residual confounding, patients who received the influenza vaccination had significantly reduced rates of hospital admissions for stroke, heart failure, pneumonia or influenza, and all-cause mortality.
  • Large experimental or quasi-experimental trials are needed to establish a causal link between influenza vaccination and clinical endpoints in patients with diabetes.

References:

Vamos EP, Pape UJ, Curcin V, Harris DPhil MJ, Valabhji J, Majeed A, et al.  Effectiveness of the Influenza vaccine in preventing admission to hospital and death in people with type 2 diabetes.  CMAJ. 2016 July 25.

Remschmidt C, Wichmann O, Harder T. Vaccines for the prevention of seasonal influenza in patients with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2015;13:53.

Researched and prepared by Alysa Redlich, Pharm.D. Candidate, University of Rhode Island, reviewed by Michelle Caetano, Pharm.D., BCPS, BCACP, CDOE, CVDOE

Could Metformin be useful to prevent Alzheimer’s?

 

 

hqdefault (2)

 

From Diabetes in Control.
July 16th, 2016
The diabetes drug may have a beneficial effect on neurodegenerative diseases.
Metformin, a biguanide, is an oral diabetes medicine used to improve blood glucose levels in people with type 2 diabetes. There have been various studies on other uses of metformin. It may be beneficial in Alzheimer’s disease, stroke and other degenerative brain cell diseases. An animal study found that metformin helps neurogenesis and enhances hippocampus, a key pathway (aPKC-CBP).

Type 2 diabetes doubles the risk of having dementia; though some studies show metformin helps reduce risk, other studies show antidiabetic medications like insulin are linked to increased risk of having dementia.

Animal studies show that metformin recruits endogenous neural stem cells and also promotes the genesis of new neurons. Metformin, however, needs to have been used for a longer period before a drastic reduction in neurodegenerative disease and its neuroprotective nature is seen.
The purpose of this study is to find a link between antidiabetic medications, especially metformin and other neurodegenerative diseases. Also, to know how long one has to be on these antidiabetics before the neuroprotective nature kicks in.

A cohort study of type 2 diabetes patients who are 55 years and above and being managed on a monotherapy antidiabetic drug of either metformin, sulfonylurea (SU), thiazolidinedione (TZD) or insulin were observed in a period of 5 years.

In the course of 5 years, dementia was identified in 9.9% of the patients. Comparing those taking metformin to those taking sulfonylurea, there was a 20% reduction in dementia in those taking metformin. The hazard ratio 0.79%, a 95% confidence interval of 0.65-0.95.

For TZD, metformin had a 23% reduction in having dementia as compared to TZD with hazard ratio of 0.77, 95% confidence interval of 0.66-0.90.

Whereas those on SU as compared to metformin had a 24% increased risk for dementia with a hazard ratio of 1.24, 95% confidence interval of 1.1-1.4.TZD had an 18% increased risk, hazard ratio of 1.18, 95% confidence interval of 1.1-1.4.

Insulin had the highest risk of 28% with hazard ratio of 1.28, 95% confidence interval of 1.1-1.6.

These findings proved that metformin use has neuroprotective benefits while insulin has an increased risk of one having dementia.
In yet another study, patients 50 years and older from Veterans Affairs, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, were recruited. Those on insulin were followed from the time they started insulin. The exclusion criteria were neuropathy, vitamin B12 deficiency, cognitive impairment, cerebrovascular disease, renal disease, and those who took insulin for less than two thirds of the study period. The sample size after all exclusions was 6,046 patients with 90% of them being male and a median age of 5.25 years.

334 cases of dementia were diagnosed, 100 of them had Parkinson’s, 71 had Alzheimer’s disease and 19 had cognitive impairment during the follow up period. The incidence of developing neurodegenerative disease was lower (2.08) for those who never used metformin as against those who used it for less than a year, which was (2.47). Metformin usage for 4 years was 0.49, 2 to 4 years was 1.30 and 1.61 for less than 2 years. This proves that the longer one stays on metformin the better the neuroprotective benefits take effect.

This study was significant for dementia (0.567 at 2-4 years and 0.252 for more than 4 years), but for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease it was 0.038 and 0.229 respectively, which happened from four years and beyond. For future studies, a larger scale prospective cohort study is needed to approve the connection between metformin use and the risk for neurodegenerative disease.

A spatial learning maze test performed on mice showed those given metformin (200mg/kg) were significantly better to be able to learn the location of a submerged platform as compared to those given a sterile saline solution.

Other studies have also proposed that metformin could stimulate neurogenesis from human neural stem cells.
Metformin is known to cross the blood-brain barrier, and has pleiotropic effects. It is known to have other possible preventive roles in cancer and heart disease. From all these various studies, one can conclude that metformin does have a therapeutic potential for mild cognitive impairment and dementia.
Practice Pearls:
Metformin use for more than 2 years has a significant reduction in neurodegenerative disease; it is neuroprotective as well as promoting neurogenesis.
Though the mechanism between metformin and neurodegenerative disease is uncertain, it is known to cross the blood brain barrier and has pleiotropic effects.
Growing evidence suggests that neural stem cells play a role in the repair of injuries or a degenerated brain.

Shi Qian, Lui Shuqian, Foseca Vivian, et al. “The effort of Metformin Exposure on Neurodegenerative disease among Elder Adult Veterans with Diabetes Mellitus”. American Diabetes Association-76th Scientific session 2016. Web June 19 2016.
Wang Jing, et al. “Metformin Activates an Atypical PKC-CBP Pathway to promote Neurogenesis and Enhance Spatial Memory Formation”. Cell Stem Cell. Vol 11(1) July 2012. Web June 19 2016.
Knopman David S et al. “Metformin Cuts Dementia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes”. Alzheimer Association International. July 2013. Web 19 2016.

Sheri Colberg: Quality of life matters more than longevity

 

Henny Nonne (geb. Heye), Max Nonne

For many years, I have focused on aspects of lifestyle and health management that can enhance quality of life, especially when living with a chronic disease like diabetes, rather than simply on living a long time (longevity). Much of my motivation is derived from the personal experience of watching my maternal grandmother suffer through six (long) years of severe disability related to cardiovascular complications of diabetes starting at the age of 70 that left her unable to feed herself or communicate, bed bound, and with almost no quality of life for her final six years of life. Really, what is the point of simply being alive when you’re really not experiencing life under such conditions?

This topic has come up again recently. New research published online ahead of print in Diabetologia in Spring 2016 (1) presented results showing that the life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy (with 95% uncertainty interval) at age 50 years were 30.2 and 12.7 years, respectively, for men with diabetes, and 33.9 and 13.1 years for women with diabetes. Really think about what those estimates mean: If you’re female and have diabetes at age 50, you would be expected to live almost to age 84, but likely be disabled in some way from the age of 71 forward. If the disability is severe (as in the case of my stroked-out grandmother), then that is a lot of pointless years of being alive without really living, not to mention the cost of caring for someone with medical disabilities that could be a huge burden to your family and the health care system.

Admittedly, that’s pretty discouraging. The best solution may be to focus on what we can do to prevent disability as we age rather than simply living longer, especially with diabetes. Here are three proven ways to improve your quality of life with diabetes (and likely your longevity):
1. Exercise regularly and be more physically active overall.

Even if you already have some diabetes-related health issues like peripheral neuropathy, which can negatively impact quality of life, exercising regularly can help. In a small study on older adults with diabetes and neuropathy, engaging in just 8 weeks of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise was shown to be a cornerstone in improving their quality of life, including experiencing less pain, more feeling in their feet, less restriction in their activities of daily living, better social interactions, and a greater overall life quality—just after 8 weeks of training (2). Other types of physical activity have similar and profound effects on living well with neuropathy (3), so choose the activities that you enjoy doing the most and start with those.
2. Eat more fiber, found abundantly naturally in plant-based foods.

We all know we should be eating more fiber, but where can you find it (besides in Metamucil, which may not have the same health benefits)? Look for it in plant-based foods, mainly fruits, vegetables, grains, beans, and nuts and seeds. Why can it enhance your health and quality of life? Dietary fiber and whole grains contain a unique blend of bioactive components including resistant starches, vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, and antioxidants, all of which are critical to healthy living. A higher fiber intake helps prevent or protect against many of the health issues that can decrease both quality of life and longevity, including certain gastrointestinal diseases, constipation, hemorrhoids, colon cancer, gastroesophageal reflux disease, duodenal ulcer, diverticulitis, obesity, diabetes, stroke, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases (4). It also keeps the healthful gut bacteria in your digestive tract more abundant, which directly can benefit health and even prevent obesity. Aim for as much as 50 grams of fiber in your daily diet for optimal health.
3. Improve the quality and quantity of your sleep.

Both sleeping better and sleeping adequate amounts (7 to 8 hours a night for most adults) lower insulin resistance and can help improve diabetes control; alternately, not getting enough good sleep can make your blood glucose levels much harder to manage effectively. As you age, it may require taking a melatonin supplement to help you fall asleep and may help improve diabetes control (5), but exercising regularly certainly assists in both as well, so try taking your daily dose of exercise to optimize sleep.

Get started on these three easy changes today to improve your chances for living longer without disabilities. Remember, there’s more to life than living a long time. What’s the point of living longer if you can’t live well and feel your best every day of your life? It really is your choice to make because you can affect the outcome.

References cited:
1.Huo L, et al. “Burden of diabetes in Australia: life expectancy and disability-free life expectancy in adults with diabetes” Diabetologia 2016; DOI: 10.1007/s00125-016-3948-x.
2.Dixit S, Maiya A, Shastry B: Effect of aerobic exercise on quality of life in population with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes: a single blind, randomized controlled trial. Quality of Life Research 2014;23:1629-1640
3.Streckmann F, Zopf EM, Lehmann HC, May K, Rizza J, Zimmer P, Gollhofer A, Bloch W, Baumann FT: Exercise intervention studies in patients with peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review. Sports Med 2014;44:1289-1304
4.Otles S, Ozgoz S: Health effects of dietary fiber. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria 2014;13:191-202
5.Grieco CR, Colberg SR, Somma CT, Thompson A, Vinik AI: Melatonin supplementation lowers oxidative stress and improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Diabetes Research, 2(3): 45-49, 2013 (doi: 10.5923/j.diabetes.20130203.02)

In addition to my educational web site, Diabetes Motion (www.diabetesmotion.com), I also recently founded an academy for fitness and other professionals seeking continuing education enabling them to effectively work with people with diabetes and exercise: Diabetes Motion Academy, accessible at http://www.dmacademy.com. Please visit those sites and my personal one (www.shericolberg.com) for more useful information about being active with diabetes.

by Dr. Sheri Colberg, Ph.D., FACSM

 

Published in Diabetes in Control 2nd July 2016

Kris Kresser: Dangers of Proton Pump Inhibitors

 

Low vitamin D doubles total mortality and dementia rates

hqdefault (2)

Being severely deficient in vitamin D is associated with a doubling of the risk of dementia according to a US study published in Neurology.

The Cardiovascular Health Study ran from the 1990s and tracked 1658 ambulatory citizens with no history of dementia or cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease.

After a five year follow up time those who had vitamin D levels below 25 nmol/L had increased rates of dementia 2.2 times that of people who had levels over 50 nmol/L.

Researchers say that there are vitamin D receptors in the brain and vitamin D is thought to enhance macrophages that clear amyloid from the brain cells and reduce neuronal cell death.

(Based in article by Michael McCarthy in BMJ 16 August 14).

 

A combined European and US study showed that total mortality was increased by 57% for older adults with vitamin D levels below 25 nmol/L. Cardiovascular deaths and cancer deaths were increased in a dose responsive manner. 

(Based on and article by Stephen Robinson GP News 23 June 14)

Bizarrely the researchers didn’t think of the obvious solution, advise upping sun exposure or taking supplemental vitamin D, but decided that what this meant was that ill people were often stuck indoors and that was why they had low vitamin D levels.

The US study above does seem to contradict that view since all participants were ambulatory and had no known cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease at the start of the study.  In my own practice in the west of Scotland most patients of all ages had very low levels of vitamin D. All walked into the surgery but had conditions that could have been affected by low vitamin D levels. The only patients who had levels over 50 nmol/L were taking supplements, cycled outdoors all year round, or used sunbeds.

 

 

Low carb high fat diets: useful for cancer prevention?

Images-Beautiful-morning-Pictures

There is some evidence that a low carb diet can help prevent cancer and also improve the outlook for people who already have the condition. Here are too sites that discuss the issue.

Dr Mercola provides an article.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/06/11/nutrition-influences-cancer.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20160611Z1&et_cid=DM107622&et_rid=1525493561

Dr Gary Fettke appears on video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa5Bcm8T9nU

 

Half of Cancer Deaths are Preventable

793258148_2d1fae3c3a
Harvard researchers find as many as 40 percent of cancer cases, and half of cancer deaths, come down to things people could easily change.

Many Americans often worry about whether chemicals, pollution or other factors out of their control cause cancer, but a new analysis shows otherwise: people are firmly in charge of much of their own risk of cancer. As we get older, our risk goes up, which could come from doing the same bad habits over a long period of time. The same can be said for being diagnosed with diabetes and prediabetes. Eating one large order of French fries will not increase your risk for cancer or diabetes, but eating two orders a week over 40 years would be over 4,000 orders, or over 2,000,000 calories and 259,000 carbohydrates, which can certainly be injurious to your health.

The team at Harvard Medical School calculated that 20 to 40 percent of cancer cases, and half of cancer deaths, could be prevented if people quit smoking, avoided heavy drinking, kept a healthy weight, and got just a half hour a day of moderate exercise. They used data from long-term studies of about 140,000 health professionals who update researchers on their health every two years for the analysis, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association’s JAMA Oncology.

“Not surprisingly, these figures increased to 40 percent to 70 percent when assessed with regard to the broader U.S. population of whites, which has a much worse lifestyle pattern than our cohorts,” wrote Dr. Edward Giovannucci of Harvard Medical School. The analysis was simple. They broke the 140,000 people into two groups: those with a healthy lifestyle, and everyone else. The healthy lifestyle definition was based on a large body of studies that have shown what personal habits are linked with higher or lower risks of cancer. They include not smoking; drinking no more than one drink a day for women, two drinks a day for men; keeping a healthy weight, defined as body mass index of between a very slender 18.5 and a slightly overweight 27.5; and getting the equivalent of just over an hour of vigorous exercise or two and a half hours of moderate exercise a week.

Heavy drinking raises colon, breast, liver and head and neck cancer rates. Obesity raises the risk of esophageal, colon, pancreatic and other cancers. Smoking causes 80 to 90 percent of lung cancer deaths. Only about 28,000 of the people analyzed qualified as following a healthy lifestyle. When the rates of cancer in their group were compared to rates in the rest of the volunteers, the differences were clear.

The purpose of the study was to estimate the proportion of cases and deaths of carcinoma (all cancers except skin, brain, lymphatic, hematologic, and nonfatal prostate malignancies) among whites in the United States that can be potentially prevented by lifestyle modification.The incidence rates of cancer were 463 per 100,000 for women in the “healthy” group, versus 618 per 100,000 for those not meeting the healthy goals. For men, it was 283 per 100,000 who met the healthy lifestyle goals versus 425 among those who did not. And these were health professionals, who should at least try to be healthier. When Giovannucci compared the healthy group to the general, white, U.S. public, the differences were even bigger. Plus, they didn’t add in other known factors, such as eating a healthy diet rich in fruits and vegetables, although they said those who followed the other healthy patterns did tend to eat better, also.

“These compelling data together with the findings of the current study provide strong support for the argument that a large proportion of cancers are due to environmental factors and can be prevented by lifestyle modification.” By “environmental,” they mean non-genetic causes. To a scientist, environment includes diet, exercise and other factors.

89,571 women and 46,339 men from 2 cohorts were included in the study: 16,531 women and 11,731 men had a healthy lifestyle pattern (low-risk group), and the remaining 73,040 women and 34,608 men made up the high-risk group. Within the 2 cohorts, the PARs for incidence and mortality of total carcinoma were 25% and 48% in women, and 33% and 44% in men, respectively. For individual cancers, the respective PARs in women and men were 82% and 78% for lung, 29% and 20% for colon and rectum, 30% and 29% for pancreas, and 36% and 44% for bladder. Similar estimates were obtained for mortality. The PARs were 4% and 12% for breast cancer incidence and mortality, and 21% for fatal prostate cancer. Substantially higher PARs were obtained when the low-risk group was compared with the US population. For example, the PARs in women and men were 41% and 63% for incidence of total carcinoma, and 60% and 59% for colorectal cancer, respectively.

From the results, it was concluded that a substantial cancer burden may be prevented through lifestyle modification. Primary prevention should remain a priority for cancer control.

Practice Pearls:
•89,571 women and 46,339 men from 2 cohorts were included in the study.
Many cancer cases and even more deaths among U.S. white individuals might be prevented by quitting smoking, avoiding heavy alcohol consumption, maintaining a BMI between 18.5 and 27.5, and exercising at a moderate intensity for at least 150 minutes or at a vigorous intensity for at least 75 minutes every week.
•These compelling data together with the findings of the current study provide strong support for the argument that a large proportion of cancers are due to environmental factors and can be prevented by lifestyle modification.

Preventable Incidence and Mortality of Carcinoma Associated With Lifestyle Factors Among White Adults in the United States. May 19, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0843.

Diabetes in Control June 11th, 2016