Diabetes Action Canada: Trade Tariffs affect patients directly

Photo by Ramaz Bluashvili on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 25 October 2025

Linxi Mytkolli, Director of patient engagement Diabetes Action Canada.

Every 10 days I insert a glucose sensor into my skin. Every three days I change the site for my insulin pump. These US made devices are how I manage my diabetes and how I stay alive. But they are not exempt from broad trade tariffs, and like many other essential medical technologies, they are now caught in an increasingly fragile global supply chain.

Lives are being placed at risk by decisions made far from the people that they affect. Steel tariffs delay infusion set manufacture, aluminium cost affect the provision of mobility aids and electronics affect hearing aids.

Steel based infusion sets are now unavailable in many countries. Without them, insulin can’t be delivered via pump systems. And it’s not just diabetes. Wheelchairs and prosthetics rely on specialised components that are affected by tariffs and restricted supply. These tools are necessities.

Trade discussions tend to focus on gross domestic product, national competitiveness and domestic manufacturing jobs, but health outcomes for people who depend on imported medical technologies also matter.

The US has increased tariffs on steel and aluminium exports to 50%. These tariffs can trigger global supply shortages and higher prices. There is no clear mechanism to protect the people who rely on medical devices that are affected.

Trade and procurement officials must actively engage with people with disabilities and patient organisations to identify essential devices and ensure that they are protected from tariffs and other restrictive policies.

Health ministries need to report and act on medical device shortages with the same urgency that they give to drug shortages.

Over one billion people worldwide live with disabilities and long term conditions. Medical device access isn’t just a logistics problem, for many it is a matter of survival.

FreeStyle Glucose Monitoring – an Update

freestyle libre on the Diabetes DietHashtag love the NHS—and the NHS in Scotland if we’re going to be specific.

Off I trotted to the diabetic clinic on Thursday armed with my best persuasion skills. Oh pleasy-weasy dear doctor, may I have a FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system? One of my arguments was going to be—Hey, you won’t be paying for it for too long. Did you see the recent research that tells me I can expect to knock eighteen years off my life expectation?!*

In the end, my polished debate wasn’t needed. Just as well as I couldn’t sell hot-water bottles to the Inuit. Or ice-cold beer to Australian sun-bathers for that matter. I brought the subject up. The doctor queried the number of blood tests I do per day and voila. I’m on a list. I’ll need to go to an education event and after that, a letter wings its way to my GP recommending she prescribes the sensors.

Sensors

Flash glucose monitoring for those of you who aren’t familiar with it is where you wear a sensor on your body (usually your upper arm) and you can take a reading from it using a monitor. It differs from blood testing in that it’s super quick and easy. You don’t need to prick your finger and you can check endlessly and the sensor works through your clothing.

Those of us who tend towards obsessive compulsive disorder—it’s hard not to when you’ve got diabetes—might baulk at that, but I am looking forward to monitoring what happens to me during exercise. And when I’m eating.

The device doesn’t come with an alarm—i.e. a warning when your blood sugar goes too far up or down, or it changes rapidly but there is software for that. The cat lover in me is delighted the manufacturers chose to call the software MiaoMiao, and this sends readings to your phone every five minutes, and will warn you of spikes.

Hello Big Brother!

You can even connect it to others’ devices, so they can monitor you too. I’ll skip that as it feels too Big Brother-y to me. Most type 1s hate other people telling them when they are hypo. Imagine how much worse this would be!

Incidentally, all this new diabetes-related tech has had a knock-on effect on the hospital I go to. Thursday’s clinic was running one hour late because it was so busy. The doctor told me he can’t get the GP support (where a GP handles some of the patients to gain experience in diabetes care), thanks partly to the fast development of new tech.

Our GPs are under so much pressure, it’s too difficult for them to keep up with all the tech that type 1s use these days—pumps, continuous glucose monitoring, flash glucose monitoring, software and more. My appointments have been spaced eight months apart for the last few years and that’s likely to change to a year from now on.

But in the meantime, I have my new toy and a whole heap of questions for Google. Can you wear it in the steam room? How much is MiaoMiao? How many actual blood tests do I still need to do to calibrate the thing?

Thanks again NHS Scotland. I look forward to reporting back.

 

*Whatevs. I debated discussing the research here and decided it wasn’t useful. Doom-laden stuff is such a turn-off isn’t it?