Endothelial damage drives vascular complications in Covid and other infections

Photo by Landiva Weber on Pexels.com

Adapted from BMJ 2-9 May (Professor Kumar Raina) and 21-26 March (Katharine Lang, Journalist)

Many viral infections such as Covid and Influenza, Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever, and the onset of sepsis from any cause are associated with thrombotic complications.

Pathogen associated molecular patterns in the microbe activate pattern recognition receptors in the endothelial cells that line our blood vessels. This action triggers inflammatory cascades. Tight junctions between cells are weakened, coagulation is triggered and the glycocalyx is damaged. Whether viral proteins, bacterial lipopolysaccharides, or dengue NS1 protein, the blood vessels show the same type of damage.

Endothelial damage causes a diverse range of acute and chronic disease. Understanding this can help us understand the acute and long term effects of some infections.

Covid-19 infection started causing vascular complications such as myocardial infarction right from the onset at Wuhan. Later studies showed that 6% to 30% of patients admitted to hospital had myocardial injury. Although the virus enters the body from the respiratory system, it exerts its systemic effect via the vasculature affecting the lungs, heart, kidneys, and brain. There is damage to the small blood vessels, inflammation and clots, and perfusion of blood to the tissues is affected.

In the acute phase Covid-19 can cause myocarditis, myocardial infarction, and blood clots in the lungs. Those in the earliest wave were affected the most. The risk was equal to having prior coronary artery disease. In the first year after Covid you are more likely to experience stroke, heart rate irregularities, heart disease, peri-carditis, myocarditis and thromboembolism. Even having mild symptoms still increases the risk to some extent.

Hypertension, diabetes, obesity, old age, and pre-existing cardiovascular disease all magnify the risks of Covid infection. The severity of the initial infection matters too. Those admitted to hospital or intensive care units fare the worse.

Long covid is a complex multi-system disorder that can affect nearly every organ system and can be very disabling. In 2024 it affected 400 million people. Neurological, neuro-psychiatric and pulmonary symptoms are the most frequent problems. Then come the cardio-vascular problems.

One characteristic is dysautonomia (the autonomic nervous system doesn’t work correctly) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Chest pain, palpitations, breathlessness and fainting are common problems. These are 1.6 times more likely in long covid sufferers compared to those without long covid. The initial severity of the infection, the higher the risk of cardiovascular complications.

Newer variants of Covid and infection in those already immunised don’t carry the same degree of risk compared to earlier waves of the infection. Some anti-viral drugs lessened the risk and others increased it. Vaccination is thought to be the best protection. Influenza vaccination also seems to protect against vascular complications. This is because the systemic inflammatory response is blunted when the person meets the infection.

Maintaining good blood pressure, good lipid control, and regular exercise are also protective.

Research Shows Benefits of Hard Exercise for Type 2 Diabetics

You'll need to pedal harder than this if you want intensity...
You’ll need to pedal harder than this if you want intensity…

New research has shown that short bursts of intense exercise improve heart structure and improve diabetes control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

A study conducted by researchers from Newcastle University has suggested that the right kind of exercise can reverse heart abnormalities in people with type 2 diabetes.

Some studies have indicated that people with diabetes are twice as likely to develop heart disease than people without diabetes, and it is one of the most common complications of diabetes.

 

For the Newcastle University study, researchers examined what happened when people with type 2 diabetes took part in intense exercise bursts of 90 seconds cycling on a stationary bike.

A total of 23 people took part in the study and scientists found that the intense bursts of exercise improved the cardiac structure and heart function. The exercise also improved blood glucose control to a small extent.

The authors of the report said that the study showed for the first time that exercise could begin to reverse early cardiac changes that are commonly found in people with type 2 diabetes. They said the greatest benefits were to heart health and that message needed to be strongly communicated to people with type 2 diabetes.

Professor Mike Trenell from Newcastle University said: “We’ve shown that short bursts of exercise improve the heart of people with Type 2 diabetes and benefits the control of their diabetes. If patients struggle to do 30 minutes of exercise then shorter, more manageable chunks still help and this includes any activity that gets the heart going such as taking the stairs instead of the lift.”

 

The original article about this research appeared on diabetes.co.uk

X-Pert Advice for Healthcare Professionals

trudiAre you a healthcare professional who is worried about advising patients to try a low carb/high fat diet?

Hi there, I’m Dr Trudi Deakin, chief executive of the charity X-PERT Health which develops, implements and evaluates structured education for the prevention and management of diabetes.

We strive to keep abreast of the latest research so that healthcare professionals and patients obtain the most up-to-date lifestyle management information. Literature reviews are undertaken on an annual basis and the research papers critically appraised to draw accurate and meaningful conclusions. The following hierarchical system for levels of evidence is used [1]:

Grading of evidence:

  • Ia: systematic review or meta-analysis of RCTs.
  • Ib: at least one RCT.
  • IIa: at least one well-designed controlled study without randomisation.
  • IIb: at least one well-designed quasi-experimental study, such as a cohort study.
  • III: well-designed non-experimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies and case-control studies.
  • IV: expert committee reports, opinions and/or clinical experience of respected authorities.

Grading of recommendations:

  • A: based on hierarchy I evidence.
  • B: based on hierarchy II evidence.
  • C: based on hierarchy III evidence.
  • D: directly based on hierarchy IV evidence.

Continue reading “X-Pert Advice for Healthcare Professionals”